CINCINNATI - The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 21 remanded a dispute over the life of retiree health benefits, in which the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion on Jan. 26, 2015, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for reconsideration of factual determinations in light of the high court's decision (Hobert Freel Tackett, et al. v. M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al., No. 12-3329, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 998).
LAKE CHARLES, La. - An expert may testify about damages related to an alleged breach of contract for a blind vendor licensing at a military base and include damages from resulting alleged lost contracts from two other bases, a Louisiana federal judge ruled Jan. 19 (Cantu Services, Inc. v. Melvin Lee Frazier, No. 12-1292, W.D. La.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6300).
HAMMOND, Ind. - A federal judge in Indiana on Jan. 16 denied an insured's motion to remand an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit back to state court, ruling that an insurance agent was fraudulently joined in the litigation and that the amount in controversy exceeds statutory minimums (Anthony Ramirez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., et al., No. 15-449, N.D. Ind.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5245).
DENVER - A federal district court erred in granting summary judgment in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit because it is unclear whether an insured had an affirmative duty to inform his insurer that he had incorporated a company he used to purchase a commercial general liability policy from the insurer, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Jan. 20 in partially reversing the district court's opinion (Corey Christy v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America, No. 14-2168, 10th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 891).
ST. LOUIS - The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 14 affirmed dismissal of breach of contract and tortious interference counterclaims filed by Riceland Foods Inc. in a class suit filed by a group of attorneys accusing the company of using some of their litigation work product without compensation (Riceland Foods v. Don M. Downing, et al., No. 14-3758, 8th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 620).
PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania federal judge on Jan. 12 granted judgment in favor of a bank and law firm, dismissing claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and breach of contract as barred by the doctrine established in Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. (263 U.S. 413 ) and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (460 U.S. 462 ) (Kathleen J. Todd v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., No. 15-2866, E.D. Pa.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3415).
FORT PIERCE, Fla. - Insurers on Jan. 11 moved to dismiss a manufacturer insured's amended counterclaim in a breach of contract and bad faith dispute, arguing that the counterclaim fails because the purported improper conduct concerns their calculation of unpaid premium and not the denial of coverage (Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. and The First Liberty Insurance Corp. v. Danfoss, LLC, No. 14-14420, S.D. Fla.).
DENVER - An insured failed to establish that it suffered water damage to "covered property" at a renovation project under a builders risk policy, a Colorado federal judge ruled Jan. 8, finding that the insurer properly denied coverage and did not breach its contract (Gerald H. Phipps, Inc. d/b/a GH Phipps Construction Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, No. 14-01642, D. Colo.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2939).
ST. LOUIS - A retirement plan sponsor's allegations that a service provider breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act failed because the provider did not owe any duty to the participants at the time the fees were negotiated and because the sponsor failed to establish a connection between its excessive fee allegations and the alleged post-contract basis for fiduciary duty, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed Jan. 8, rejecting the position of the U.S. Department of Labor (McCaffree Financial Corp. v. Principal Life Insurance Company, No. 15-1007, 8th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 214).
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. - A commercial general liability insurer had no duty to defend an additional insured against breach of contract claims for failure to pay a company for remediating water damage to a school, a North Carolina federal judge ruled Jan. 7, because the breach was a separate and independent act severing the causal connection with the water intrusion (Westfield Insurance Co. v. Nautilus Insurance Co., No. 14-772, M.D. N.C.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1432).
HARRISONBURG, Va. - A defendant's expert may not offer an opinion as to whether ants were present in pallets at the time they were delivered to the defendant in breach of contract case, a Virginia federal judge ruled Jan. 7; however, the judge permitted the expert to testify as to the existence of insect galleries or tunnels in the pallets (Grottoes Pallet Company, Inc. v. Graham Packaging Plastic Products, Inc., No. 15-00017, W.D. Va.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1459).
OKLAHOMA CITY - Remand of an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit is not proper because the amount in controversy exceeds the statutory limits, a federal judge in Oklahoma ruled Jan. 5 (Michael Hockenbury v. The Hanover Insurance Co., No. 15-1003, W.D. Okla.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1267).
DENVER - A federal judge in Colorado on Jan. 6 denied an insurer's motion for partial summary judgment in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit, ruling that the insureds' breach of contract and Colorado law claims are not time-barred (Jesus Borrego and Joanne Borrego v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., No. 14-1732, D. Colo.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1014).
LOS ANGELES - A federal judge in California on Jan. 4 dismissed without prejudice an environmental cleanup company's claims for breach of contract, accounts stated and open book account against BP America Inc. in a lawsuit accusing BP of failing to pay the company $1.7 million for cleanup activities it conducted in the Gulf of Mexico following the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in April 2010, finding that the plaintiff company failed to adequately state the claims (Advanced Cleanup Technologies Inc. v. BP America Inc., et al., No. 14-cv-09033, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1192).
ST. LOUIS - The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 21 affirmed a district court's decision to grant summary judgment for a mortgage firm, finding that a bank breached a contract when it refused to repurchase residential mortgage loans (CitiMortgage Inc. v. Chicago Bancorp Inc., No. 15-1375, 8th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22192).
HACKENSACK, N.J. - A New Jersey judge on Dec. 17 granted a motion for expedited discovery brought by a group of hospitals, finding that their requests for documents related to certain hospital-ranking methodology and resulting scores of hospitals that are not parties to the suit are relevant to their breach of contract claims about the insurer's newly announced tiered health plan (Capital Health Systems Inc., et al. v. Horizon Healthcare Services Inc., No. BER-C-369-15, N.J. Super., Chanc. Div.; 2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2957).
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - An Alabama federal judge on Dec. 17 declined to exclude to an expert from testifying regarding the cause of a railcar accident at a terminal in a negligence and breach of contract lawsuit (CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PSL North America, LLC, No. 13-00982, N.D. Ala.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168677).
PHILADELPHIA - In a Dec. 17 protective order motion filed in Pennsylvania federal court, The Coca-Cola Co. seeks to have discovery materials pertaining to its trade secrets and employees' personally identifying information (PII) designated confidential in a breach of contract lawsuit over stolen company laptops that contained PII (Shane K. Enslin v. The Coca-Cola Co., et al., No. 2:14-cv-06476, E.D. Pa.).
PHOENIX - A trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of an insurer in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit because an insured failed to show that the insurer did not attempt to honor the insured's claim for automobile insurance benefits, an Arizona Court of Appeals panel ruled Dec. 15 (Judith E. Indihar, as personal representative of the Estate of James L. Indihar, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., No. 1 CA-CV 14-0621, Ariz. App., Div. 1; 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 1535).
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on Dec. 15 granted a motion filed by the owner of a dating social media network application to dismiss claims asserted by a user for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and Dating Service Contracts Act (DSCA) but permitted him leave to amend the complaint (Mark Howell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Grindr LLC, No. 15cv1337, S.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167669).
FRESNO, Calif. - A California appeals panel on Dec. 11 reversed a judge's granting of a directed verdict and remanded for retrial an insured's claims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing against his insurer for denied coverage of water damage to his rental house, but not the claim for punitive damages (Artyun Vardanyan v. AMCO Insurance Co., No. F069953, Calif. App., 5th Dist.; 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8925).