ATLANTA - An insured's breach of contract claim against its insurance broker must be dismissed because the insured, seeking coverage for underlying suits arising out of exposure to hepatitis A from food purchased from the insured, failed to show that a valid contract existed between the parties, a Georgia federal judge said June 16 (Sentinel Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tropical Smoothie Cafe LLC, et al., No. 16-4162, N.D. Ga.).
RIVERSIDE, Calif. - A California appeals court on June 16 affirmed a trial court's dismissal of a borrower's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation, finding that he lacked standing and that he was not a party to any contract with the lender (Ronald Ferguson v. Bank of America, N.A., No. E064100, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 2, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4124).
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on June 13 ordered an insurer to show cause as to why an insured's breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit should be litigated in federal court and not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Reseda Medical Clinic, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Company, et al., No. 17-3686, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90932).
SAN FRANCISCO - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 15 affirmed a bankruptcy court's ruling in favor of various lenders, finding that borrowers lacked standing to assert claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and that their breach of contract claims failed (In re Rosanna Mac Turner, No. 15-60046, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10622).
HACKENSACK, N.J. - Property owners filed a complaint in the Bergen County Superior Court on June 12 contending that Verizon New Jersey Inc. is liable for $1,591,435 in damages because it failed to remediate contamination on property it leased from the plaintiffs in breach of its rental contract (Joan Rudnick, et al. v. Verizon New Jersey Inc., No. L-4023-17, N.J. Super., Bergen Co.).
ORLANDO, Fla. - A woman who alleges that her age was the motivating factor in a decision to not renew her employment contract has established a prima facie case of age discrimination, a Florida federal judge ruled June 12, finding that genuine issues of fact precluded granting her former employer's motion for summary judgment (Carmel Saxon v. Seminole County Public Schools, No. 6:15-cv-01854, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89663).
DENVER - A Colorado federal judge on June 12 entered a final judgment in favor of a professional liability insurer after finding that it has no duty to defend or indemnify against an underlying lawsuit alleging that its insured entered into a "kickback contract" to steer additional subcontractor work to city-employee-controlled companies (Ciber, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co., No. 16-1189, D. Colo., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89895).
MILWAUKEE - A federal magistrate judge in Wisconsin on June 9 ruled that plaintiffs can pursue claims for strict products liability against the manufacturer of a component in a hip replacement system after finding that the Wisconsin Supreme Court would not allow the contract specification defense to bar the plaintiffs' claims (Jerome Janusz, et al. v. Symmetry Medical Inc., et al., No. 15-CV-294, E.D. Wis., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88895).
FORT WORTH, Texas - A Texas federal judge on June 8 granted an insurer's motion for judgment on the pleadings seeking dismissal of an insured's extracontractual claims in a flood coverage dispute, further exercising its discretion to dismiss the insured's declaratory judgment claim (Mike Farhat v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., No. 16-1175, N.D. Texas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87766).
DAYTON, Ohio - An Ohio federal judge on June 5 dismissed a former property owner's claims against loan servicers for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), finding that the property was exempt from RESPA requirements because it was more than 25 acres and that the court lacked jurisdiction over his breach of contract claims (Michael Hoy v. Aurora Loan Services LLC, et al., No. 3:16-cv-502, S.D. Ohio, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85999).
NEWARK, N.J. - An insured has failed to state any plausible claims to support his contention that his life insurance provider breached its contract or acted in bad faith in canceling his policy without providing proper notification, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled June 5 in granting the insurer's motion to dismiss (David M. Watkins v. Protective Life Insurance Co., No. 17-0734, D. N.J., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85862).
CHICAGO - A federal court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a medical expert was qualified to provide testimony on the nature of physician teaching contracts in a podiatric residency program, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held June 5 in affirming the conviction of a doctor for taking kickbacks to refer patients to a Chicago hospital (United States of America v. Shanin Moshiri, No. 16-1126, 7th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9959).
PHILADELPHIA - In a breach of contract dispute, a reinsurer in a June 1 motion asks a Pennsylvania federal court to compel an insurer to produce all documents it redacted or withheld concerning "reserves," "reinsurance," "other reinsurance" and "proprietary" information (R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., No. 16-cv-01473, E.D. Pa.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California federal magistrate on June 2 granted a commercial general liability insurer's motion to dismiss Yahoo! Inc.'s breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for underlying class action allegations that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by transmitting unsolicited text messages (Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., No. 17-00447, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85200).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A shipyard may supplement its removal notice with government contracts and affidavits detailing the role the U.S. Navy played in requiring asbestos aboard ships, a Louisiana federal judge held June 2 (Lorita M. Savoie, et al. v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., et al., No. 15-1220, E.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84804).
CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on June 1 dismissed breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims brought by the rehabilitator of two insolvent insurers against a mortgage insurance reinsurer and a bank (People of the State of Illinois, ex rel., Anne Melissa Dowling, Acting Director of Insurance of the State of Illinois, as Rehabilitator for Triad Guaranty Insurance Corporation and Triad Guaranty Assurance Corp. v. AAMBG Reinsurance Inc., No. 16-cv-07477, N.D. Ill., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84231).
MIAMI - A Florida federal judge on May 26 denied a motion to dismiss after determining that an insurer's suit seeking a coverage declaration for an underlying suit arising out of its insured's alleged defective roofing work presents an appropriate controversy to be decided by the federal court (Atain Specialty Insurance Co., v. Kenneth Russell Roof Contracting LLC, No. 16-23627, S.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81960).
TAMPA, Fla. - An insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify its insured in a false advertising lawsuit because the insured failed to tender the complaint to the insurer as required, a federal judge in Florida ruled May 26 in granting the insurer's motion for partial summary judgment in an insurance bad faith and breach of contract lawsuit (Scott, Blane and Darren Recovery LLC, et al. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., No. 15-153, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81042).
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on May 24 granted preliminary approval of a $51,150,000 settlement to be paid the developers of a condominium-hotel project in San Diego for allegedly failing to disclose the buyers' right to rescind their purchase contracts in violation of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA), California's Subdivided Lands Act (SLA) and California's unfair competition Law (UCL) (Dean Beaver, et al. v. Tarsadia Hotels, a California Corporation, et al., No. 11-1842, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80648).
OXFORD, Miss. - Summary judgment in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit is not proper because an insured has stated material issues of genuine fact that must be determined before any judgment may be issued in the action, a federal judge in Mississippi ruled on May 23 in denying an insurer's motion (Patricia L. Smith, et al. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Co., No. 16-0001, N.D. Miss., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78104).
SYRACUSE, N.Y. - In a breach of contract dispute over asbestos coverage, a reinsurer opposes in separate briefs filed on May 24 an insurer's request to a New York federal court for summary judgment on reimbursement and allocation issues (Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Munich Reinsurance America Inc., No. 12-cv-00196, Munich Reinsurance America Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co., No. 13-cv-00743, N.D. N.Y.).