FLORENCE, S.C. - A Michigan federal judge on March 21 found that a borrower failed to allege a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) in relation to the denial of her loan modification application, finding that even if her claims against the lenders were true, she failed to state a RESPA claim against them (Alice M. Mangum v. First Reliance Bank, et al., No. 4:16-CV-02214, D. S.C., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40103).
ATLANTA - The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 1 affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a borrower's claim for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) in relation to a written request for information, finding that he failed to show that he had standing to assert a claim for statutory damages (Charles Meeks v. Ocwen Servicing LLC, No. 16-15536, 11th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3677).
BALTIMORE - A Maryland federal judge on Feb. 17 found that coverage for an underlying lawsuit alleging that an insured was negligent in the provision of settlement services for the sale of a home is barred by a professional liability insurance policy's exclusion for "insufficiency in the amount of the proceeds" (Resource Real Estate Services, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Co., No. 16-168, D. Md., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22920).
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - A Florida federal judge on Feb. 6 dismissed claims for negligence and violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) against a bank in relation to a request for information but allowed a claim for violation of Florida consumer collection law to proceed (Loris B. Ranger, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a America's Servicing Company, No. 15-62511, S.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17148).
NEW YORK - The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 31 affirmed a bankruptcy court's finding that a mortgage company's statutory duty to respond to a request under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) was never triggered (Barry F. Mack v. Rescap Borrower Claim Trust, No. 16-304, 2nd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1683).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California federal judge on Jan. 20 dismissed class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), negligence and other causes of action related to a data breach of a real estate trust's computer system, finding that former tenants of the trust's property failed to show that they had standing to sue (Mark Foster, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Essex Property Inc., No. .5:14-cv-05531, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8373).
GULFPORT, Miss. - A federal judge in Mississippi on Jan. 20 denied a property owner's motion for partial summary judgment, ruling that the plaintiff company did not present sufficient facts to show that a construction company's transfer of assets to another company after judgment had been entered against it in arbitration hearing was fraudulent (RDS Real Estate LLC v. Abrams Group Construction LLC, et al., No. 15CV361-LG-RHW, S.D. Miss.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8180).
CINCINNATI - The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 20 affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a borrower's compulsory counterclaim of foreclosure, finding that a foreclosure case is not "logically related" to a claim for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (Christine Marais v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 16-3323, 6th Cir.; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1095).
THE HAGUE, Netherlands - The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on Jan. 13 issued various updates in an arbitration commenced by numerous real estate entities against the Russian Federation in relation to an alleged real estate investment in Crimea, announcing that the Russian Federation did not participate in a recent hearing on jurisdiction and admissibility (Everest Estate LLC, et al. v. The Russian Federation, No. 2015-36, PCA).
CHICAGO - An insurer has no duty to indemnify an insured and no duty to reimburse an additional insured for alleged water damage to an apartment building because there was no covered "occurrence" for the insured's failure to properly cover the building's roof, an Illinois federal judge ruled Jan. 6 (Brit UW Ltd. v. Tripar Inc. and Davis Russell Real Estate and Management LLC, No. 15-5866, N.D. Ill.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2462).
DETROIT - A Michigan federal judge on Dec. 20 adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation that the majority of claims asserted by former property owners against two loan companies in relation to the foreclosure of their property be dismissed, but found that their cause of action for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) should be allowed to proceed (Rodney Helm, et al. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al., No. 15-cv-12394, E.D. Mich.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175450).
LONDON - An England and Wales court on Dec. 19 rejected the appeal of an investor in a Moscow real estate project of a judgment enforcing a $72,243,000 arbitral award issued in favor of another investor by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), finding that the judge did not err in his interpretation that an underlying arbitration clause existed (Ashot Yegiazaryan v. Vitaly Ivonovich Smagin, No.  EWCA Civ 1290, England and Wales App.).
NEW YORK - A group of institutional investors has met all statutory requirements to serve as lead plaintiff in a securities class action against a real estate investment trust and several of its former executive officers and directors, a federal magistrate judge in New York ruled Nov. 29 (Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds v. Brixmor Property Group Inc., et al., No. 16-2400, S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164682).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A California federal magistrate judge on Nov. 29 partially granted a loan servicer's motion to dismiss claims for fraudulent misrepresentation but allowed part of a borrower's claim for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) to proceed (Frank Malifrando v. Real Time Resolutions Inc., et al., No. 2:16-cv-0223, E.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164497).
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 23 dismissed an appeal of a borrower's claims for violation of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), finding that a letter he sent was not considered a qualified written request and that his TILA claim was barred by a statute of limitations (Joseph A. Guerra v. Just Mortgage, Inc., et al., No. 13-16725, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21108).
NEW YORK - New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman on Nov. 18 announced that a $25 million settlement had been reached ending claims that Trump University - which was owned by President-elect Donald Trump and marketed itself as a university to train, educate and mentor entrepreneurs involved in real estate investing - was actually a sham and defrauded its students out of millions of dollars.
BALTIMORE - A Maryland federal judge on Nov. 8 certified a class of borrowers who allege that a title company violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by providing cash and other benefits to mortgage lenders in exchange for referrals (Edward J. and Vicki Fangman, et al. v. Genuine Title, LLC, et al., No. 14-81, D. Md.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154582).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A California federal judge on Nov. 2 held that a Real Estate Property Managed endorsement rendered an insurer's policies excess with respect to an underlying personal injury claim, finding that the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnity its property manager insured (Atain Specialty Insurance Co. v. Sierra Pacific Management Co., et al., No. 14-00609, E.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152874).
BOSTON - A Massachusetts appeals panel on Oct. 25 ruled that evidence presented during a construction defects trial did not support a jury's finding that a couple was entitled to $1 million in damages and upheld a second judge's decision to hold a trial solely on damages allegedly resulting from misrepresentations of the builders and real estate agents (Kathryn Culley, et al. v. Authentic Traditions LLC, et al., No. 15-P-1020, Mass. App.; 2016 Mass. App. Unpub. 1029).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A District of Columbia federal judge on Oct. 24 granted a motion for summary judgment finding that the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) did not apply to an underlying loan and remanded various causes of action to a state court for lack of jurisdiction (Anthony Floyd v. PNC Mortgage, a division of PNC Bank, N.A., et al., No. 14-2190, D. D.C.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146679).