BOSTON - A First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 2 said an Employee Income Retirement Security Act case against a transportation company that is an alleged alter ego of a defunct transportation company that owes withdrawal liability can proceed, saying it is well established in First Circuit law that the alter-ego doctrine applies to ERISA claims (Edward F. Groden v. N&D Transportation Co., et al., No. 15-2553, 1st Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14184).
MINNEAPOLIS - A Minnesota federal judge on July 31 granted Target Corp.'s motion to dismiss an Employee Retirement Income Security Act action and a securities action against it, finding that the ERISA claims failed to plausibly allege that the defendants breached their duty of prudence, duty of loyalty and duty to monitor plan investment committee members and that the plaintiffs failed to show that the defendants' statements were false or misleading when made, as required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (In re: Target Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 16-1315; In re: Target Corp. ERISA Litigation, No. 16-2400, D. Minn., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120055).
BOSTON - A shareholder filed a securities class action against a genetic tumor testing provider and certain of its executive officers on July 28, alleging that the defendants artificially inflated the company's stock price by misrepresenting that it was on track to receive Medicare reimbursement and coverage for its testing in violation of federal securities laws (Marc F. Mahoney v. Foundation Medicine Inc., et al., No. 17-11394, D. Mass.).
NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on July 28 substantially denied dismissal of claims in a securities class action lawsuit against a specialty pharmaceutical company and certain of its current and former executive officers and directors, ruling that a shareholder has shown that the defendants violated federal securities laws by concealing a significant downsizing of its salesforce for one of its drugs, as well as the exclusion of the drug from the formularies of several of the nation's largest health insurers (Andrew Meyer v. Concordia International Corp., et al., No. 16-6467, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119436).
NEW YORK - Ruling that a federal district court should first consider new evidence from a pair of enforcement actions against a company, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on July 27 vacated a shareholder's appeal and remanded the action to the district court for further review of the new evidence (Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. FXCM Inc., et al., No. 16-3775, 2nd Cir.).
BLUEFIELD, W.Va. - A businessowners liability insurer on July 28 asked a West Virginia federal court to enter a default judgment against its insured in its declaratory judgment lawsuit challenging coverage for seven lawsuits alleging that the insured's employee filed fraudulent tax returns (Ohio Security Insurance Co. v. K R Enterprises, Inc., et al., No. 15-16264, S.D. W.Va.).
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Lead plaintiffs in a securities class action lawsuit against a 3D printer manufacturer and certain of its executive officers have failed to plead any actionable misrepresentations in claiming that the defendants violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting the company's business prospects, an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled July 25 in affirming a federal district court's ruling dismissing the suit (In re Stratasys Ltd. Shareholder Securities Litigation, No. 16-3264, 8th Cir.; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13370).
SANTA ANA, Calif. - Lead plaintiffs in a securities class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company and certain of its executive officers have shown that the defendants issued misrepresentations regarding the clinical trial results for the company's breast cancer treatment drug in violation of federal securities laws, a federal judge in California ruled July 25 in denying the defendants' motion to dismiss (Hsingching Hsu v. Puma Biotechnology Inc., et al., No. 15-0865, C.D. Calif.).
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on July 24 granted PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's (PwC) motion for judgment on the pleadings in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action, saying that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they are entitled to relief under ERISA for their whipsaw claims (Timothy Laurent, et al. v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, et al., No. 06-cv-2280, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115067).
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge in California on July 26 denied a motion to dismiss filed by defendants in a securities class action lawsuit against GoPro Inc. and certain of its executive officers, ruling that the lead plaintiff in the action properly pleaded a material misrepresentation or omission, scienter and loss causation in making his federal securities law claims (Anton Bielousov v. GoPro Inc., et al., No. 16-6654, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117223).
ANN ARBOR, Mich. - A Native American tribe cannot pursue claims that its health care plan administrator violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by failing to charge the tribe Medicare-like rates for contracted services at a hospital because the tribe waited too long to sue, a Michigan federal judge held July 21 (Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, et al. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. Munson Medical Center, No. 5:14-cv-11349, E.D. Mich., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113759).
BURLINGTON, Vt. - Partial summary judgment is not warranted in a securities class action lawsuit against a coffee company and certain of its executive officers because lead plaintiffs have stated a plausible claim for relief in making their federal securities law claims, a federal judge in Vermont ruled July 21 in denying the defendants' motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, et al. v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc., et al., No. 11-0289, D. Vt.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114473).