SAN JOSE, Calif. - Although a California federal judge found the motion to file a third amended complaint (TAC) to add an additional named plaintiff in a privacy class action against Facebook Inc. to be untimely, he found no bad faith on the plaintiffs' part and no substantial prejudice to Facebook, granting the motion in a May 22 ruling (In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation, No. 5:10-cv-02389, N.D. Calif.).
FORT MYERS, Fla. - A Florida federal judge on May 24 declined to exclude the testimony of a patent validity expert but limited the testimony of a damages expert so that taxes are not deducted from an accused infringer's gross profit margin, finding that if there is infringement, it is more equitable for the patent holder to receive any windfall that may occur by not deducting the taxes paid (Chico's Fas, Inc. v. Andrea Clair, et al., No. 2:13-cv-792, M.D. Fla.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67394).
ORLANDO, Fla. - Two Florida women have sufficiently alleged defamation against Fox News Networks LLC related to its airing of a video clip of the women on television and posting of it online, a Florida federal judge ruled May 21, denying the network's motion to dismiss (Kathleen M. Duffy, et al. v. Fox News Networks LLC, No. 6:14-cv-01545, M.D. Fla.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66534).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge erroneously deemed an infringement plaintiff's copyrighted "zebra" design invalid, according to a May 22 ruling by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Meridian Textiles Inc. v. Topson Downs of California Inc. et al., No. 12-17590, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8545).
SAN FRANCISCO - Allegations that various defendants infringed 24 copyrighted jewelry designs will proceed to trial, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 22 (A'lor International Ltd. v. Tappers Fine Jewelry Inc., et al., No. 13-55816, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8548).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a 6-2 ruling, with Justice Stephen G. Breyer recused, the U.S. Supreme Court on May 26 rejected claims by Cisco Systems Inc. that having a good faith belief that a patent is invalid can serve as a defense to claims of induced patent infringement (Commil USA LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc., No. 13-896, U.S. Sup.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Washington federal judge's determination that Microsoft Corp. did not infringe various claims of a speech recognition patent was upheld May 22 by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Allvoice Developments US LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 14-1258, Fed. Cir.).
CHARLOTTE, N.C. - A North Carolina federal magistrate judge's order granting a patent infringement defendant's motion to transfer venue to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan was reversed May 21 by a North Carolina federal judge (Celgard LLC v. LG Chem Ltd., No. 14-43, W.D. N.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66600).
BOSTON - A request by Boston University for summary judgment of infringement of a semiconductor patent was denied May 20 by a Massachusetts federal judge (Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co. Ltd., et al., No. 12-11935, D. Mass.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65840).
OKLAHOMA CITY - A former student of the late, famed golfer Moe Norman was preliminarily enjoined, in part, by an Oklahoma federal judge on May 20 from using the "Moe Norman" trademark in connection with golf services (Estate of Moe Norman et al. v. Greg Lavern, No. 14-1435, W.D. Okla.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65611).
NEW ORLEANS - Finding no abuse of discretion in a Texas federal judge's decision to deny a prevailing copyright infringement defendant its attorney fees, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 20 affirmed (Macro Niche Software Inc., et al. v. Imaging Solutions of Australia, No. 14-20371, 5th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8348).
GREENSBORO, N.C. - A North Carolina federal magistrate judge on May 19 granted Allergan Inc. and Duke University leave to amend to remove all allegations of infringement of one patent while narrowing their infringement allegations as they relate to another (Allergan Inc. and Duke University v. Apotex Inc., et al., No. 14-1028, M.D. N.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64973).
SAN FRANCISCO - Although a California federal magistrate judge abused his discretion by "categorically" denying a prevailing copyright infringement plaintiff her full request for attorney fees, he properly denied a motion for sanctions by the plaintiff in connection with alleged evidence spoliation, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 19 (Victoria Ryan v. Editions Limited West, et al., Nos. 12-17810, 13-15061, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8199).
RICHMOND, Va. - A Virginia federal judge's injunction barring two trademark infringement counterclaim defendants from using the "NAACP" trademark was vacated May 19 by the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which remanded with instructions to dismiss the counterclaim (The Radiance Foundation, et al. v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al., No. 14-1568, 4th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8203).
INDIANAPOLIS - Although noting that entry of a default judgment in response to discovery abuses is an "extreme" and "draconian" measure, an Indiana federal magistrate judge on May 18 nonetheless found that conduct by two copyright infringement defendants "warrants the harshest of sanctions" (Malibu Media LLC v. Kelley Tashiro and N. Charles Tashiro, No. 13-205, S.D. Ill.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64281).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Although leaving intact a California federal jury's determination that Apple Inc.'s design and utility patents were infringed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC (Samsung, collectively), the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 18 vacated a finding by jurors that Apple's asserted registered and unregistered iPhone trade dress is entitled to protection (Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al., Nos. 14-1335, 15-1029, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8096).
PASADENA, Calif. - Reversing a previous panel decision ordering YouTube LLC and Google Inc. to take down a controversial anti-Muslim film based on an actress' "heartfelt plea for personal protection," an en banc Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority on May 18 held that "a weak copyright claim cannot justify censorship in the guise of authorship" (Cindy Lee Garcia v. Google Inc., et al., No. 12-57302, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8105).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A final decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel a registration for "Pretzel Crisps" in connection with pretzel crackers on grounds that the term is generic was vacated and remanded by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 15 (Princeton Vanguard LLC v. Frito-Lay North America Inc., No. 14-1517, Fed. Cir.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a letter filed May 15, the U.S. government defendants in a lawsuit regarding the surveillance activities of the National Security Agency (NSA) advised the District of Columbia U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of a recent ruling in which the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals found "no reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone metadata" (Larry Elliott Klayman, et al. v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al., No. 14-5004, 14-5005, 14-5016, 14-5017, D.C. Cir.).
PHILADELPHIA - The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 15 vacated a $7,120 sanction entered against a former physician accused of trademark infringement (American Board of Surgery Inc. v. Keith A. Lasko, et al., No. 14-1785, 3rd Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8031).
PITTSBURGH - Although a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge found that no jurisdiction existed over a Chicago-based chocolatier that is the defendant in a cybersquatting lawsuit, in a May 12 ruling she opted to transfer the matter to Illinois rather than grant the defendant's dismissal motion (Mon Aimee Chocolat Inc. v. Tushiya LLC, et al., No. 2:14-cv-01568, W.D. Pa.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62048).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Although a Maryland federal judge properly granted a pharmaceutical company summary judgment of noninfringement under 35 U.S. Code Section 271(e)(1) with regard to certain activities, the summary judgment must be vacated with regard to others, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 13 (Classen Immunotherapies Inc. et al. v. Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 14-1671, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7854).
PHILADELPHIA - A New Jersey man claiming fraud over his purchase of a classic car from a California dealer did not establish that state's jurisdiction over the defendants, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 11, finding that the dealer's interactive website and two emails did not constitute purposeful availment of its activities toward New Jersey (John Corigliano v. Classic Motor Inc., et al., No. 14-3586, 3rd Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7722).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Rejecting the "sweeping notions of common-law tort liability" advanced by a patent owner and a dissenting judge, a divided panel of the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 13 again found that a defendant is not responsible for the actions of its customers who carried out "other steps" that led to infringement (Akamai Technologies Inc. et al. v. Limelight Networks Inc., Nos. 09-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7856).