WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) did not err in invalidating three patents relating to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded July 17 (Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Illumina Inc., No. 14-1550, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12343).
RICHMOND, Va. - Three software patents were deemed invalid pursuant to 35 U.S. Code Section 101 on July 17 by a Virginia federal judge (MicroStrategy Inc. v. Apttus Corp., No. 15-21, E.D. Va.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93419).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in dismissing a cross-appeal, on jurisdiction grounds, of an inter partes re-examination decision, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled July 17 (Airbus S.A.S. v. Firepass Corporation, No. 14-1808, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12340).
SAN FRANCISCO - In a July 20 brief opposing dismissal, a former driver for Uber Technologies Inc. asserts that he was a victim of identity theft as a result of a data breach experienced by his former employer and, therefore, he has sustained an injury sufficient to established standing to bring his class action complaint against Uber (Sasha Antman v. Uber Technologies Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv-01175, N.D. Calif.).
LOS ANGELES - A trade dress dispute over "Element Periodic Table Soap" was dismissed by a California federal judge on July 17 on jurisdiction grounds (Bubble Genius LLC v. Mariann Smith, No. 15-66, C.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93492).
SAN FRANCISCO - Retail establishments do not have standing to bring claims on their own behalf as indirect purchasers and have not adequately pleaded that they are entitled to injunctive relief in a pay-for-delay case, a California federal judge ruled July 17, while permitting the grocery stores an opportunity to amend their complaint (United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, et al. v. Teikoku Pharma USA Inc., et al., No. 14-02521, N.D. Calif.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A divided panel of the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 21 affirmed dismissal of California state law unfair competition and conversion claims, but vacated a California federal judge's interpretation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) as permitting commercial marketing of a biologic before receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval (Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sandoz Inc. et al., No. 15-1499, Fed. Cir.).
SAN FRANCISCO - Although winning a post-trial motion for a directed verdict of no direct patent infringement, Marvell Semiconductor Inc. on July 17 was denied in its effort to recoup the attorney fees it incurred in defending the suit (France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc., No. 12-4967, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93470).
SAN FRANCISCO - Allegations that Nintendo of America Inc. and Nintendo Company Ltd. (Nintendo, collectively) infringed a patent with its popular "Game Boy" device were rejected July 17 by a California federal judge (Quintal Research Group Inc. v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al., No. 13-888, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93488).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)'s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to refuse a trademark registration for "Peace Love and Juice" was remanded by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 20 (Juice Generation Inc. v. GS Enterprises LLC, No. 14-1853, Fed. Cir.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California federal magistrate judge on July 15 granted in part and denied in part an insurer's motion to compel an insured to respond further to its first set of requests for production in a coverage lawsuit over an underlying trade secret dispute (Silicon Storage Technology Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., et al., No. 13-05658, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92775).
ATLANTA - A Florida federal judge's adoption of a Florida federal magistrate judge's recommendation that a plaintiff be awarded $600,000 in liquidated damages, as well as attorney fees, as a sanction for a defendant's "egregious" disregard of a final consent order was affirmed July 16 by the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Blanco GmbH + Co. KG v. Vito Antonio Laera, et al., No. 14-11814, 11th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265).
BOSTON - A Massachusetts federal judge's injunction was partly reversed July 16 by the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, on grounds that it mandates attribution of certain trademarks despite finding that a plaintiff was unlikely to succeed on the merits of a false advertising claim (Arborjet Inc. v. Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements Inc., No. 14-2324, 1st Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12300).
PHILADELPHIA - A Delaware federal judge's denial of a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case rested on an "overly narrow interpretation of the kind of confusion that is actionable under the Lanham Act," the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled July 16 (Arrowpoint Capital Corp. v. Arrowpoint Asset Management LLC, No. 14-3063, 3rd Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12283).
BOSTON - Although largely agreeing with a Massachusetts federal judge's "capable handling" of a "complex case," the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 16 nonetheless found that the district court erred in concluding that a copyrighted work cannot be both joint and derivative as a matter of law (Ross Greene v. J. Stuart Ablon, et al., Nos. 13-2237, -2294, -2369, 1st Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12305).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - After hearing arguments regarding an award of sanctions against the attorneys in a patent litigation that has spanned more than 13 years and four appeals, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on July 15 affirmed a district court's assessment of almost $200,000 in sanctions against the attorneys related to discovery abuses surrounding their client's false deposition testimony (Alexander S. Orenshteyn, et al. v. Citrix Systems Inc., No. 15-1056, Fed. Cir.).
COLUMBUS, Ohio - Finding it clear that the computer hard drives of a man accused of illegal online file sharing are relevant to the copyright infringement claim against him, an Ohio federal judge on July 14 ordered production of the drives for examination under a protective order shielding any portions of the drives designated as confidential by the defendant (Malibu Media LLC v. David Ricupero, No. 2:14-cv-00821, S.D. Ohio; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91263).
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A copyright infringement plaintiff has 30 additional days to engage in discovery with Kohl's Department Stores Inc. in connection with a thumbnail image of a reindeer figurine, an Ohio federal magistrate judge ruled July 15 (Hua-Cheng Pan v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc., No. 12-1063, S.D. Ohio; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92001).
AUSTIN, Texas - Efforts by Samsung Austin Semiconductor (SAS) LLC to quash a subpoena by Rembrandt Secure Computing LP in Rembrandt's patent lawsuit against Apple Inc. were largely successful on July 15 (Rembrandt Secure Computing LP v. Apple Inc. et al., No. 15-438, W.D. Texas; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91756).
LOS ANGELES - In a pair of July 10 in chambers orders, a California federal magistrate judge found deposition-related violations by two lawyer placement firms embroiled in a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit, awarding sanctions to each (Lateral Link Group LLC v. Habeas Corp., et al., No. 2:14-cv-05695, C.D. Calif.).
BOSTON - Although a copyright infringement plaintiff appears to own valid copyrights for its website, a Massachusetts federal judge on July 13 found that he is unable to conclude that the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims (IvyMedia Corporation v. iLIKEBUS Inc. et al., No. 15-11918, D. Mass.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91342).
LOS ANGELES - Allegations that the producers and distributors of the film "12 Years A Slave" violated the Lanham Act by misrepresenting the authorship of the film's score were dismissed with prejudice on July 10 by a California federal judge, who denied leave to amend after finding that any amendment by plaintiff Richard Friedman would be futile (Richard Friedman v. Hans Zimmer, et al., No. 15-502, C.D. Calif.).
DENVER - Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code Section 1291, the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 14 reversed and remanded a decision by a Colorado federal judge to sanction an attorney for filing a motion to supplement and amend what was at one time a patent infringement complaint (Predator International Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA Inc. and Industrias El Gamo S.A., No. 14-1354, 10th Cir.).
SAN FRANCISCO - Finding that a plaintiff failed to meet its own proposed "bright line" test for determining when post-suit willful patent infringement has occurred, a California federal judge on July 9 dismissed the willfulness claim with leave to amend (Cisco Systems Inc. v. Arista Networks Inc., No. 14-5344, N.D. Calif.).