ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - A critical care emergency medical transport company is entitled to further jurisdictional discovery into the individuals involved in denying its health insurance claim and where a defendant defends suits, a federal magistrate judge held Sept. 18 (Med Flight Air Ambulance Inc. v. MGM Resorts International, et al., No. 17-246, D. N.M., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151265).
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. - A panel of the Tennessee Court of Appeals on Sept. 18 reversed a defense verdict and ordered a new trial in a medical malpractice suit after finding that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on the sudden emergency doctrine (Brittany Nicole VanDyke v. Brooke E. Foulk, M.D., et al., No. E2016-00584-COA-R3-CV, Tenn. App., 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 621)
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - An insured sued the Federal Emergency Management Agency, its administrators and Wright National Flood Insurance Co. on Aug. 17 in a New York federal court, alleging that he was wrongfully denied $141,274.50 in insurance proceeds for Superstorm Sandy damage to his Long Beach, N.Y., home (David Clutter v. William B. Long, et al., No. 17-4833, E.D. N.Y.).
SAN DIEGO - After finding that wages provided for under California labor code are considered wages and constitute restitution, a California federal judge on July 31 refused to dismiss a claim for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) asserted by a group of ambulance and emergency medical technicians against their employers (Rueben Calleros, et al. v. Rural Metro of San Diego Inc., No. 17-cv-00686, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120119).
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. - A Tennessee appellate panel on May 2 found that a man who was allegedly hit by an emergency medical technician (EMT) while he was strapped down to a gurney did not need to attach an expert affidavit and reversed the trial court's decision to dismiss the suit with prejudice and ordered the suit be remanded to be dismissed without prejudice (Jonathon Fitzrandolph Zink v. Rural/Metro of Tennessee L.P., et al., No. E2016-01581-COA-R3-CV, Tenn. App., 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 276).
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on April 28 awarded more than $705,000 in attorney fees for class counsel who settled a wage-and-hour class dispute, nearly $389,000 less than counsel was seeking, but conditioned the award on paying to class members approximately $131,000 that would have, under the reversionary nature of the settlement, been returned to the defendant (Margaret McGreevy, et al. v. Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc., No. 14-7457, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65085).
TYLER, Texas - A shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit on April 27 in Texas federal court, alleging that an operator of a network of free-standing emergency rooms and certain of its current and former executive officers and directors misrepresented the company's business condition in violation of federal securities laws (Sascha Troll v. Adeptus Health Inc., No. 17-0241, E.D. Texas).
NEW ORLEANS - With no comment, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on April 5 denied an emergency motion filed by a consortium of eight national and Texas-based trade associations that sell annuities and other life insurance products for an injunction pending appeal of the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) new fiduciary duty rule (Chamber of Commerce of the USA, et al. v. United States Department of Labor, et al., No. 17-10238, 5th Cir.).
CAMDEN, N.J. - A New Jersey federal judge on March 31 granted a federal flood insurer's motion for summary judgment in a Superstorm Sandy coverage dispute, rejecting the insured's argument that bulletins from Federal Emergency Management Agency waived the proof-of-loss requirement and extended the time under which she could file her coverage lawsuit (Theresa Caivano v. Allstate Insurance Co., No. 15-5791, D. N.J., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50490).
DALLAS - A Texas federal judge on March 20 denied a coalition of insurance associations' emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal of a ruling that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has not exceeded its authority in formulating its new "fiduciary rule" and that the new rule does not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, saying that the plaintiffs have not met their burden to satisfy four factors required to obtain an injunction pending appeal (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. Edward Hugler, Acting Secretary of Labor, et al., No. 3:16-cv-1476, consolidated with 3:16-cv-1530, 3:16-cv-1537, N.D. Texas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39806).
DALLAS - A Texas federal judge on March 14 instructed a coalition of insurance associations opposed to the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) new "fiduciary rule" to file a supplemental brief to their emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal of a ruling that the DOL has not exceeded its authority in formulating the new rule and that the new rule does not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. Edward Hugler, Acting Secretary of Labor, et al., No. 3:16-cv-1476, consolidated with 3:16-cv-1530, 3:16-cv-1537, N.D. Texas).
ATLANTA - A Georgia appellate panel on March 14 affirmed the grant of summary judgment to a hospital and the denial of summary judgment to the doctor in a case where a patient with mental health issues killed himself after being discharged from the hospital after finding that the trial court correctly excluded the plaintiffs' experts from opining on the standard of care applied to the emergency room nurses (Richard Bernard Everson, et al. v. Phoebe Sumter Medical Center Inc., No. A16A1709, Brian Jordan v. Richard Bernard Everson, et al., No. A16A1710, Ga. App., 3rd Div., 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 128).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A collection of community groups, the NAACP and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) on March 2 filed notice of petition with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency seeking emergency action to abate "the imminent and substantial endangerment" to East Chicago, Ind., posed by lead contamination of drinking water.
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on Jan. 28 granted an emergency motion for stay of removal filed by two immigrants seeking to represent themselves and a class of individuals with refugee applications, holders of valid visas and other individuals from seven countries who are legally authorized to enter the United States in response to an executive order issued by President Donald Trump one day earlier changing the way certain non-citizens may enter the United States and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the refugee resettlement program (Hameed Khalid Darweesh, et al. v. Donald Trump, et al., No. 17-480, E.D. N.Y.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Five Michigan Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives on Oct. 26 sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking her to investigate a series of concerns pertaining to lawsuits involving the lead-contaminated water crisis in Flint, Mich., including the way in which the State of Michigan is applying its emergency manager law (EML) to block the City of Flint from suing the state.
CHICAGO - Failing to apply for a job with a replacement subcontractor does not doom retaliation claims filed against that employer by two emergency medical technicians (EMTs) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA), the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Oct. 19 (Shannon Volling, et al. v. Kurtz Paramedic Services, Inc., No. 15-3572, 7th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18816).
ST. LOUIS - Johnson & Johnson on Sept. 20 filed an opposition response to a plaintiffs' emergency motion to remand a suit to Missouri state court, saying the removal of the suit in which the plaintiffs claim that there is a link between the company's baby powder and cancer was timely (Tiffany Hogans, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 4:16-cv-01470-JCH, E.D. Mo.).
NEW ORLEANS - The mere fact that a man and his co-workers cannot identify a company that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products to their employer does not preclude recovery or justify finding the defendant improperly joined, a federal judge in Louisiana held Sept. 14 in granting emergency remand (William Gregory Bozeman v. Wyeth Holdings Corp., et al., No. 16-14606, E.D. La.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124713).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Three weeks after the CEO of online classifieds website operator Backpage.com LLC was granted an emergency stay from a trial court's order requiring him to comply with a U.S. Senate subcommittee's discovery subpoena related to an online sex trafficking investigation, a District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel majority on Sept. 2 dissolved the stay and affirmed the order requiring compliance (Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations v. Carl Ferrer, No. 16-5232, D.C. Cir.).