HOUSTON - A Texas county's post-argument submission is improper and fails to prove that it provided workers' compensation benefits for a judge employed in its courthouse, a woman pursuing an asbestos action on behalf of the former judge told a Texas appeals court on Nov. 22 (Jefferson County, Texas v. Ellarene Farris, et al., No. 01-17-00493-CV, Texas App., 1st Dist.).
HOUSTON - A resolution extending benefits to optional employees is valid and places an asbestos case brought on behalf of a former judge under the exclusivity provision of the workers' compensation system, a government entity told a Texas appeals court on Nov. 15 (Jefferson County, Texas v. Ellarene Farris, et al., No. 01-17-00493-CV, Texas App., 1st Dist.).
WILMINGTON, Del. - A man employed by third parties at a chemical plant and whose work was controlled by those parties has no negligence claim against the premises owner, a Delaware judge held Oct. 26 (Jeffrey A. Warner v. Covestro LLC, et al., No. N15C-02-060 ASB, Del. Super., New Castle Co.).
ATLANTA - A workers' compensation insurer proposes a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order on Oct. 9 with the Georgia federal court in a dispute over whether its policies insured certain staffing companies for claims also tendered to an insolvent insurer (Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Sussex Insurance Co., No. 16-03975, N.D. Ga.).
LOS ANGELES - The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) on Oct. 9 cross-appealed to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals challenging a ruling vacating and setting aside reimbursement demands made to it under workers' compensation insurance policies (California Insurance Guarantee Association v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 15-01113, C.D. Calif.).
ASHEVILLE, N.C. - Merely knowing of the presence of asbestos and its hazards is not enough to escape the state's workers' compensation exclusivity provision, a federal judge in North Carolina held Sept. 29 (Howard Milton Moore Jr., et al. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al., No. 16-157, W.D. N.C., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162517).
ATLANTA - In a dispute over whether workers' compensation policies insured certain staffing companies for claims also tendered to an insolvent insurer, a Georgia federal judge on Sept. 20 denied a proposed case management approach for limited discovery (Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Sussex Insurance Co., No. 16-cv-03975, N.D. Ga.).
ATLANTA - In a dispute over whether workers' compensation policies insured certain staffing companies for claims also tendered to an insolvent insurer, a Georgia federal judge issued a protective order on Aug. 28 on the procedures for sealing confidential materials (Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Sussex Insurance Co., No. 16-3975, N.D. Ga.).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) breached its statutory duty to reimburse a joint powers authority for excess workers' compensation coverage owed under an insolvent insurer's policy, a California appeals panel affirmed July 17 (CSAC Excess Insurance Authority v. California Insurance Guarantee Association, No. C081775, Calif. App., 3rd Dist., 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4854).
NEW YORK - In a dispute regarding reinsurance of workers' compensation risks, a New York federal judge on June 8 ordered the parties to arbitration, noting that it "is entirely speculative" whether an arbitrator will rule on the role of a group of companies as real parties in interest (In the matter of the arbitration between National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 16-CV-8821, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88470).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - While not uncontested, enough evidence supports a law judge's conclusion that an employee was both exposed to asbestos and other chemicals within the compensable period for a workers' compensation claim and that the exposure was significant enough to cause bladder cancer, a Pennsylvania appeals court held May 4 (Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, No. 656 C.D. 2016, Pa. Cmwlth., 2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 175).
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Because the state's workers' compensation system contemplates coverage for mesothelioma, the law's exclusivity provision bars a tort action against an employer, even where the disease arose outside the period for filing a claim, the Arkansas Supreme Court held Dec. 15 in a 4-3 opinion (Brenda Hendrix, et al. v. Alcoa Inc., No. CV-15-558, Ark. Sup.).
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - The complexity of asbestos cases requires that the workers' compensation commissioner have the power to grant provisional dismissals to "clear the room" and then reinstate claims as necessary, Connecticut's top court held in an opinion set for release on Dec. 20 (John Graham, et al. v. Olson Wood Associates Inc., et al., No. SC 19626, Conn. Sup.; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 371).
CHARLOTTE, N.C. - A mesothelioma sufferer has standing to pursue, and the court has jurisdiction over, claims that an employer and its insurer are not making timely payments under North Carolina's workers' compensation statutes, a federal judge in North Carolina held Sept. 9 (James Norman Richardson v. PCS Phosphate Company Inc., et al., No. 16-00068, W.D. N.C; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122354).
DALLAS - A Texas appellate panel on Aug. 16 affirmed summary judgment in favor of a general contractor and subcontractors in an injured worker's tort-based lawsuit because, it said, the worker's exclusive remedy was through the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (Juan Carlos Flores v. Chasco Inc., et al., No. 05-14-00531-CV, Texas App., 5th Dist.; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 8913).