NASHVILLE, Tenn. - The Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Association (TIGA) argues in an Aug. 14 brief that a Tennessee federal court should remand its reimbursement dispute over a workers' compensation claim against book publishers because diversity jurisdiction is not present (Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Association v. Penguin Random House LLC, et al., No. 17-1070, M.D. Tenn.).
LINCOLN, Neb. - A workers' compensation insurer and a reinsurer's billing agent have no standing to bring a claim for breach of a "Reinsurance Participation Agreement" (RPA), the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled July 21, dismissing their case (Applied Underwriters Inc., et al. v. S.E.B. Services of New York Inc., et al., No. S-16-496, Neb. Sup., 2017 Neb. LEXIS 132).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) breached its statutory duty to reimburse a joint powers authority for excess workers' compensation coverage owed under an insolvent insurer's policy, a California appeals panel affirmed July 17 (CSAC Excess Insurance Authority v. California Insurance Guarantee Association, No. C081775, Calif. App., 3rd Dist., 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4854).
AUSTIN, Texas - A Texas appellate panel on July 13 reversed a $43 million verdict for a man who was injured while working on a construction site, finding that Texas' Workers' Compensation Act precludes recovery of common-law damages (Berkel & Company Contractors Inc. v. Tyler Lee, No. 14-15-00787-CV, Texas App., 14th Dist.).
HELENA, Mont. - A trial judge did not err in granting summary judgment to an insured employer against the Montana Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) based on the exclusivity provision of the Montana Workers' Compensation Act (WCA), a majority of the Montana Supreme Court affirmed June 13 (Asurion Services LLC v. Montana Insurance Guaranty Association, No.16-0581, Mont. Sup., 2017 Mont. LEXIS 339).
NEW YORK - In a dispute regarding reinsurance of workers' compensation risks, a New York federal judge on June 8 ordered the parties to arbitration, noting that it "is entirely speculative" whether an arbitrator will rule on the role of a group of companies as real parties in interest (In the matter of the arbitration between National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 16-CV-8821, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88470).
MADISON, Wis. - Environmental asbestos exposure claims appear to simply be an attempt at avoiding the exclusivity provision of the state's workers' compensation law, while claims involving the licensing of a patent appear entirely frivolous and must be explained, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal held June 6 while affirming judgment for the two companies at the heart of the appeal (Janet Pecher, et al. v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-1799, Dianne Jacobs, et al. v. Rapid American and Weyerhaeuser Co. and Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2376, Katrina Masephol v. Weyerhaeuser Co., et al., No. 16-2377, Robert Sydow, et al. v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2378, Kathy Boyer v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2379, Janice Seehafer v. Weyerhaeuser Co., et al., No. 16-2380., 7th Cir.).
DES MOINES, Iowa - The Iowa Supreme Court on May 19 reversed a jury's $25 million punitive damages award entered in favor of an insured after determining that a trial court erred in ruling on motions for summary judgment that a workers' compensation insurer acted in bad faith by contesting the insured's request for a lump-sum settlement of a workers' compensation claim (Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance Co., No. 15-1032, Iowa Sup., 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 52).
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on May 9 scheduled oral argument on whether a dispute regarding reinsurance of workers' compensation risks should be sent to arbitration for a panel to decide (In the Matter of the Arbitration Between National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 16-cv-08821, S.D. N.Y.).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - While not uncontested, enough evidence supports a law judge's conclusion that an employee was both exposed to asbestos and other chemicals within the compensable period for a workers' compensation claim and that the exposure was significant enough to cause bladder cancer, a Pennsylvania appeals court held May 4 (Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, No. 656 C.D. 2016, Pa. Cmwlth., 2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 175).
BOSTON - Interest for an employee's workers' compensation claim against an insolvent insurer starts from the date the Department of Industrial Accidents received notice of the claim resulting in the award of benefits, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed May 8 (Jeffrey Comeau v. Enterprise Electronics Inc. and Eastern Casualty Insurance Co. in liquidation c/o Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund, No. 2016-P-0134, Mass. App., 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 54).
NEW YORK - Apportionment of liability between employers who exposed a man pursing a workers' compensation case is inappropriate where all the evidence leads one to conclude that he suffered from no symptoms or disease prior to his May 1999 pleural plaques diagnosis, a New York appeals court held May 4 (In the matter of the claim of Robert Manocchio v. ABB Combustion Engineering, et al., No. 522436, N.Y. Sup. App., 3rd Dept., 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3509).
LOS ANGELES - California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) is entitled to an order vacating and setting aside three reimbursement demands of $119,122 made under workers' compensation insurance policies, a California federal judge ruled May 3 (California Insurance Guarantee Association v. Thomas E. Price, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 15-cv-01113, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67589).
FRANKFORT, Ky. - A neurologist used proper methodology and produced sufficient documentation to support his opinion that a man is suffering from toxic encephalopathy caused by his exposure to the chemical toluene in the spray paint he used at work, the Kentucky Supreme Court held April 28 in affirming a ruling on the man's disability in a workers' compensation case (Armstrong Coal Company, Inc. v. Nathan Attebury, et al., No. 2016-SC-000368-WC, Ky. Sup., 2017 Ky. Unpub. LEXIS 10).
BALTIMORE - A man's asbestos-related exposures occurring during work covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) provide his employer with immunity from third-party claims, a federal judge in Maryland held April 25 in granting a railroad summary judgment (Charles Lemuel Arbogast Jr., et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Co., et al., No. 14-4049, D. Md.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62255).
CHICAGO - An Illinois judge on March 31 ordered the end of the rehabilitation of a workers' compensation trust at the request of the state's director of insurance (In the Matter of the Rehabilitation of Illinois State Bowling Proprietors' & recreational Industry Workers' Compensation Trust, No. 11 CH 36870, Ill. Cir., Cook Co.).
SAN DIEGO - An insurer is entitled to $37,000 in restitution from a man who pleaded guilty to misrepresenting to the company that nurses he sent to work at skilled-nursing facilities were computer programmers to obtain a lower workers' compensation policy premium, a California appeals panel ruled March 22 in affirming the man's conviction (People v. John Paul Riddles, No. D069419, Calif. App., 4th Dist., 1st Div., 2017 Calif. App. LEXIS 259).
CHICAGO - An Illinois judge on March 10 granted a motion to suspend the briefing schedule on a liquidator's petition so that a claimant can secure documentation in support of his workers' compensation claim (In the Matter of the Liquidation of Illinois Movers' & Warehousemen's Risk Management Group, No. 12-CH-09140, Ill. Cir., Cook Co.).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - The liquidator of the insolvent Reliance Insurance Co. asked a Pennsylvania court on Feb. 23 to approve an agreement under which a policyholder would receive direct payments from one of Reliance's reinsurers (In re: Reliance Insurance Co. in liquidation, No. 1 REL 2001, Pa. Cmwlth.).