BEAUMONT, Texas - A Texas appeals panel on Feb. 19 affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of an insured as modified in a coverage dispute over damage caused by Hurricane Ike (National Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Latosha A. Lewis, No. 09-13-00413-CV, Texas App., 9th Dist.; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 1573).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana appeals panel on Feb. 11 held that there there is sufficient evidence to support a jury's finding that the owner and operator of three radio stations sustained covered losses of $5,906,988 caused by Hurricane Katrina, further affirming a $2,953,494 bad faith ruling against the insurer (Citadel Broadcasting Corp., et al. v. Axis U.S. Insurance Co. a/k/a Axis Reinsurance Co., No. 2014-CA-0326, La. App., 4th Cir.).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Feb. 5 denied a federal flood insurer's motion to exclude the report, opinions and testimony of a general contractor hired by the insured to inspect property damage caused by Hurricane Isaac, finding that the contractor's estimate is "reliable and relevant" (Ricarlo Alleyne v. Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast, et al., No. 13-5657, E.D. La.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14005).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Feb. 6 held that because an insured did not submit a signed, sworn proof of loss with an independent adjustor's report on his supplemental Hurricane Isaac claim, he failed to comply with his federal flood insurance policy's proof of loss requirement (A.C. White v. Allstate Ins. Co., et al., No. 13-5634, E.D. La.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14669).
NEW ORLEANS - A majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court denied an insured's appeal challenging an appeals court's ruling that an insurer's exception of lis pendens was properly sustainedas to five of the insured's claims, according to a Feb. 6 news release (Lionel Harris Sr., et al. v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Co., No. 2014-C -2484, La. Sup.).
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A majority of a Florida appeals court on Feb. 4 found that a lower court properly granted summary judgment in favor of an insurer because the insurer participated in the appraisal process after a lawsuit compelling it to engage in arbitration was filed but not because of the lawsuit and nothing remained to be done as to the insured's requested relief for windstorm damage caused by Hurricane Wilma (Susan I. Pedersen v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, No. 4D12-4264, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426).
HOUSTON - An independent adjuster lacks standing to sue under the False Claims Act (FCA) because he is not an original source, a Texas federal judge ruled Jan. 29, dismissing his qui tam lawsuit alleging that various insurers and adjusters committed fraud in responding to damage claims involving hurricanes Katrina and Ike (United States of America, ex rel. Kermith Sonnier v. The Standard Fire Insurance Co., et al., No. 12-1065, S.D. Texas; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10006).
JACKSON, Miss. - A majority of the Mississippi Supreme Court on Jan. 22 granted a petition for writ of certiorari filed by an insured seeking to reverse an appeals court's rejection of her bad faith and negligence lawsuit arising from her alleged loss caused by a casino barge that collided with her home during Hurricane Katrina (Cherri R. Porter v. Grand Casino of Mississippi Inc., et al., No 2010-CT-00307-SCT, Miss Sup.).
TRENTON, N.J. - A policy's anti-sequential clause and the exclusionary language for earth movement and water damage did not cover insureds' loss from a partial collapse of their building following Hurricane Irene, a New Jersey appeals panel affirmed Jan. 20, finding that water seepage caused soil erosion (Ashrit Realty LLC and Bhavika Realty LLC v. Tower National Insurance Co., No. A-1647-13T4, N.J. Super., App. Div.; 2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 107).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Jan. 12 denied a homeowners insurer's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law in a Hurricane Isaac coverage dispute but granted its alternative motion to amend a jury's award for dwelling damages from $70,000 to $69,448.89 to prevent the insureds from receiving $551.11 in double recovery (Tracey Arcement, et al. v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Services Inc., No. 13-5436, E.D. La.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3902).
ATLANTA - The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 8 affirmed a lower court's ruling that an insured failed to give timely notice of its loss caused by Hurricane Wilma, further finding that there is no material issue of fact as to whether the insured rebutted the resulting presumption of prejudice to the insurer (The Yacht Club on the Intracoastal Condominium Association Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co., Nos. 13-12486, 13-15581, 13-15842, 11th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 293).
GALVESTON, Texas - A waiver by the Federal Emergency Management Agency was limited to $7,000 of the $112,000 sought by an insured in his third proof of loss (POL) over Hurricane Ike flood damage, a Texas federal magistrate judge ruled Jan. 7, granting the insurer's motion for summary judgment (Jason Fennelly v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., No. 12-024, S.D. Texas; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1290).
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A majority of a Florida appeals panel on Jan. 7 ordered a new trial regarding code upgrade damages in a coverage dispute over hurricane damage but affirmed the lower court's finding that a primary insurance policy was a blanket policy with a $2.5 million per-occurrence limit and no sublimit for business income damage (Landmark American Insurance Co. v. Pin-Pon Corporation, et al., Nos. 4D12-3997 & 4D12-4002, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 189).
RALEIGH, N.C. - Finding that an insured failed to submit a timely and properly documented amended proof of loss for additional Hurricane Irene damage, a North Carolina federal judge on Nov. 26 granted summary judgment in favor of a federal flood insurer on the insured's breach of contract claim (Gladys Greene v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., No. 13-255, E.D. N.C.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165951).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Nov. 17 found that an insured has failed to demonstrate that it submitted a properly documented proof of loss as required under its Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP), granting a federal flood insurer's motion for summary judgment in a coverage dispute arising from Hurricane Isaac damage (Construction Funding, LLC v. Fidelity National Indemnity Insurance Co., et al., No. 13-5630, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161414).
RUTLAND, Vt. - A Vermont federal judge on Nov. 13 granted a federal flood insurer's motion for summary judgment in an insured's lawsuit seeking additional coverage for flood damage caused by Hurricane Irene (Abend Family Limited Partnership v. NGM Insurance Co., No. 5:13-cv-8, D. Vt.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160574).
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - Finding that an insured did not comply with the terms of his standard flood insurance policy (SFIP) because he failed to submit a signed and notarized proof of loss for all of his claimed Hurricane Irene flood damages, a Connecticut federal judge on Nov. 12 granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the insured's breach of contract lawsuit (Moshe Azoulay v. Allstate Insurance Co., No. 3:12-cv-1693, D. Conn.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159177).
NEW ORLEANS - An agreement between a contractor and a subcontractor did not obligate the subcontractor to test the liquid propane (LP) detector in Federal Emergency Management Agency trailers delivered and installed after hurricanes Katrina and Rita; therefore, neither the agreement nor any act or omission on the part of the subcontractor was a but-for cause of flash fire injuries, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Nov. 11 in an indemnification dispute between two insurers (Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., No. 13-30541, 5th Cir.).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Nov. 4 found that a federal flood insurer underpaid its insured's building damage by $14,341.02, ordering the insurer to pay the amount in a coverage dispute over Hurricane Isaac damage (Everage Tuircuit III v. Wright National Flood Insurance Co., No. 13-6268, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156386).
NEW ORLEANS - Sums that were subject to appraisal in a Hurricane Isaac coverage dispute were genuinely disputed; therefore, an insurer's compliance with a contractual appraisal process does not provide evidence of bad faith, a Louisiana federal judge ruled Oct. 31, granting the insurer's motion for summary judgment (Island Concepts LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, No. 13-6725, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155494).
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. - A federal judge in West Virginia on Oct. 29 partially granted and partially denied a motion for an injunction sought by the operator of a landfill that is being sued by the City of Hurricane, W.Va., and a county government for allegedly disposing of hazardous chemicals illegally (City of Hurricane, W.Va., et al. v. Disposal Service Incorporated, et al., No. 14-15850, S.D. W.Va.).
GALVESTON, Texas - A Texas judge on Oct. 16 entered a final judgment in favor of an insurer in a Hurricane Ike coverage dispute, ordering the insured to take nothing against the insurer and taxing $39,901.95 in court costs against the insured (League City v. TWIA, No. 12-0053, Texas Dist., 10th Jud., Galveston Co.).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Oct. 15 declined to dispose of a homeowner's bad faith claim against her insurer, related to Hurricane Isaac damages, finding that genuine fact disputes exist over matters such as the amount of coverage and cooperation with the claim investigation (Evonthe Hayes v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co., No. 2:14-cv-00376, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146962)