WASHINGTON, D.C. - The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) on Nov. 4 announced that it has published a new issue of the ICSID Review.
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Nov. 7 found that an attorney never represented several defendants in a criminal action and had no duty to them, dismissing their claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (Yijin Lu, et al. v. Deng, et al., No. 2:16-cv-07283, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154395).
ANN ARBOR, Mich. - The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Nov. 7 that the co-owner of a Detroit-area home health care agency has been sentenced by a federal judge in Michigan to 96 months in prison and ordered to pay $38 million in restitution after being found guilty for his role in a $33 million Medicare fraud scheme (United States of America v. Zafar Mehmood, et al., No. 12-cr-20042, E.D. Mich.).
NEW YORK - A couple's evidence requests in an asbestos-talc case seek duplicate production or evidence more appropriately produced in discovery, a New York justice held in an opinion posted Nov. 4 (Keri LoGiudice and Joseph LoGiudice v. American Talc Co., et al., No. 190253/2014, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).
LAS VEGAS - An insurer's attorney billing records in an underlying lawsuit over auto accident liability claims may be material to contractual and bad faith claims in the related coverage dispute, a Nevada federal magistrate judge ruled Nov. 4, granting in part the claimants' motion to compel (Melinda Booth Dogra, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., No. 2:14-cv-01841, D. Nev.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154121).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on Nov. 4 ruled that a veteran's claim for benefits related to exposure to Agent Orange was not supported by a medical examination and affirmed a decision that denied the veteran benefits (Ray S. Goldston v. Robert A. McDonald, No. 15-3538, U.S. App., Vet. Clms.; 2016 U.S. App., Vet Claims LEXIS 1708).
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A man who contends that he was injured as a result of exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (known as C8) from a plant operated by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. on Nov. 7 filed a brief in Ohio federal court in one of the cases included in the multidistrict litigation, arguing that the court should deny the company's motion for summary judgment because the issue of the availability of punitive damages has been determined (In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. C8 Personal Injury Litigation, MDL No. 2433, No. 13-2433, S.D. Ohio).
SAN DIEGO - A California court on Nov. 4 affirmed a decision to grant a motion filed by wireless phone companies and others to quash claims against them for negligence and violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) in relation to an allegedly stolen photograph that was uploaded online, finding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the defendants (Strasner v. Touchstone Wireless Repair and Logistics, LP, et al., No. D068865, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 1).
AUSTIN, Texas - Two days before oral argument was scheduled to begin in a dispute over discovery requests concerning relators' attorney fees in a multidistrict litigation hailstorm property damage coverage dispute, the Texas Supreme Court reset oral argument for Feb. 7, according to a Nov. 8 pronouncement (In Re National Lloyds Insurance Co., Wardlaw Claims Service Inc. and Ideal Adjusting Inc., No. 15-0591, Texas Sup.).
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - In a trademark infringement dispute, an internet marketing expert may not testify on whether a marketing consultant could determine the success of a startup company and whether the registration of a website domain name was "highly unusual and possibly unethical," a Kentucky federal magistrate judge ruled Nov. 4 (Louisville Marketing Inc. d/b/a Jewelry In Candles v. Jewelry Candles LLC v. P. Micah Buse, No. 15-00084, W.D. Ky.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153329).
CHICAGO - An Illinois appeals panel on Nov. 8 affirmed a lower court's ruling in favor of an insurer in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying trademark infringement dispute (Selective Insurance Company Of The Southeast v. Member's Property, Inc., No. 1-14-3436, Ill. App., 1st Dist., 2nd Div.; 2016 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2366).
HOUSTON - A lawsuit brought by 30 Chinese fishermen over an oil spill in the Bohai Sea in June 2011 was dismissed by a federal judge in Texas on Nov. 8, who ruled that "this is a dispute among three Chinese parties about Chinese waters, it belongs in China" (Peiqing Cong, et al. v. ConocoPhillips Company, No. H-12-cv-1976, S.D. Texas; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154508).
SEATTLE - A Washington federal court erred when it determined that an employee's state law gender-based hostile work environment claim was preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 4, reinstating the jury verdict from the first trial in favor of the employee and remanding for reconsideration of the damages (Mary Matson v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 13-36174, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19927).
SAN FRANCISCO - A district court erred in determining that a disability claimant was capable of working in a sedentary position because the evidence shows that the claimant was able to sit for only four hours in an eight-hour workday, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Nov. 4 (Avery Armani v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., No. 14-56866, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19925).
CINCINNATI - A surety's settlement of breach of contract claims against the state of Michigan for refusal to make final payments to a general contractor for work to a prison kitchen was not in bad faith because the surety and the contractor had shared interests, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Nov. 7 (Great American Insurance Co. v. E.L. Bailey & Company Inc. and Edward L. Bailey, No. 15-2149, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20018).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Three users of Facebook Inc. filed a putative class action against the social networking giant in California federal court Nov. 3, alleging that its online advertising platform violates the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by permitting advertisers to prevent members of certain demographics from seeing ads related to housing or employment opportunities (Suzanne-Juliette Mobley, et al. v. Facebook Inc., et al., No. 5:16-cv-06440, N.D. Calif.).
NEW YORK - An insurer argued in a federal court in New York on Nov. 4 that it and its German reinsurer should arbitrate a dispute over which version of an underlying policy was actually reinsured (HDI Global SE v. Lexington Insurance Company, No. 16-cv-07241, S.D. N.Y.).
LOS ANGELES - After finding that a former Red Cross employee's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), fraud and other claims against her former employer did not arise under California's workers' compensation law, a California federal judge on Nov. 4 denied her ex parte application to remand the case to a state court (Xochitl Nisbet v. American National Red Cross, et al., No. 16-7342, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153626).
CHICAGO - The National Hockey League (NHL) on Nov. 4 asked the federal judge in Illinois overseeing a wrongful death suit brought by the estate of a former professional hockey player to reconsider his order allowing the estate to file a second amended complaint, saying the claims brought by the estate in the second amended complaint are preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Len Boogaard, et al. v. National Hockey League, et al., No. 13-C-4846, N.D. Ill.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134232).
MILWAUKEE - In an employer negligence lawsuit, a Wisconsin federal judge decided Nov. 3 several motions filed by the employer to exclude testimony offered by an ergonomist, an employee's former treating physician and a medical expert to support the employee's case that his diagnosis of osteoarthritis was caused by his work (David Rowley v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., No. 11-46, E.D. Wis.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153391).
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - A liability expert may testify on the reasonable safety of a driveway and whether it needed repairs, a Missouri federal judge ruled Nov. 3, also denying summary judgment to the property owners because fact issues exist as to whether they should have discovered the dangerous condition (Amy Fontaine and Todd Fontaine v. Columbia Properties Ozarks Ltd., et al., No. 15-04213, W.D. Mo.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152343).
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - A hazard analysis expert may testify as to whether the conditions present at a store created a dangerous situation, a New Mexico federal judge ruled Nov. 4, also denying summary judgment to Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. because there is sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to the company's alleged breach of duty (Patricia Cabrera v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., No. 15-597, D. N.M.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153664).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - The liquidator of an insolvent insurer asked a Pennsylvania court on Nov. 3 to approve a plan by which a reinsurer will make direct payments of workers' compensation and employers' liability claims to an insured, thus relieving the insolvent insurer of its obligations to the insured (In re: Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation, No. 1 REL 2001, Pa. Cmwlth.).
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - A frequently litigated data transmission patent will be the subject of an upcoming inter partes review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board revealed Nov. 3 (Apple Inc., et al. v. Evolved Wireless LLC, No. IPR2016-00981, PTAB).