LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
FTAIA Bars Antitrust Claims In USB Connector Case, New York Federal Judge Rules

NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on May 14 dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Sherman Act claims brought by a Chinese manufacturer of universal serial bus (USB) 3.0 connectors against other manufacturers that do not manufacture or directly sell any USB 3.0 connectors in the United...

States, Penguin Settle E-Books Price-Fixing Litigation; Apple Set For Trial

NEW YORK - Texas and several other states and territories and classes of purchasers have reached an agreement with Penguin Group (USA) Inc. on allegations that several publishers and Apple Inc. conspired to fix prices of electronic books, according to a May 22 letter filed with the federal judge in New...

Several State-Law Claims Against Apple Are Dismissed On Eve Of Antitrust Trial

NEW YORK - The federal judge in New York overseeing the multidistrict litigation against Apple Inc. on claims that the company conspired with several publishers to fix prices of electronic books approved the dismissal of several state-law claims on May 29, just days before the June 3 trial date (In re...

Purchasers' Settlement With Video Game Software Maker Receives Final Approval

OAKLAND, Calif. - A federal judge in California on May 30 granted final approval to a $27 million settlement of purchasers' claims that a manufacturer of interactive video game software violated antitrust law by entering into exclusive trademark licenses with U.S. football associations (Geoffrey...

$150M Settlement Receives Final Approval In Flonase Sham Litigation Case

PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge in Pennsylvania on June 14 granted final approval to a $150 million cash settlement between Flonase manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) and a certified class of 33 direct purchasers on the direct purchasers' claims that GSK filed a series of sham citizen petitions...

High Court Remands Reverse-Payment Settlement Cases To 3rd Circuit

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on June 24 vacated the judgment of the Third Circuit in antitrust litigation involving the drug K-Dur and remanded for further consideration in light of its recent ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., et al., in which it held that reverse-payment...

Calif. Cipro Purchasers Seek Approval Of Settlement With Bayer Over Pay-For-Delay

SAN DIEGO - California purchasers of the antibiotic Cipro and third-party payers who reimbursed for California purchases of Cipro on July 11 asked a state court to grant preliminary approval to their $74 million cash settlement with Bayer Corp. and Bayer AG (collectively, Bayer) on claims that Bayer...

Purchasers Fail To Allege Article III Standing In IPhone App Case, Judge Rules

OAKLAND, Calif. - A federal judge in California on Aug. 15 dismissed with leave to amend an action claiming that Apple Inc. monopolized and attempted to monopolize the iPhone applications aftermarket, finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they suffered actual injury necessary to establish...

9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Antitrust Class Action Over ITunes, IPods

SAN FRANCISCO - A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Sept. 3 affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a California woman's antitrust claims against Apple Inc. based on purported monopolization and supracompetitive prices in the digital music market (Stacie Somers v. Apple Inc., No. 11...

Text Messengers Must Arbitrate Antitrust Claims, Federal Judge Rules

NEW YORK - Text message service companies alleging that wireless communication companies, a trade organization and aggregators conspired to restrain trade and monopolize the market for application-to-person (A2P) text messages must arbitrate their federal antitrust claims, a federal judge in New York...

Unfair Competition Class Action Against Skype Reinstated By Appeals Court

LOS ANGELES - A California appeals panel on Oct. 4 found that a woman's putative class claims alleging unfair competition, false advertising and related claims against Skype Inc., over its claims of "unlimited" calling plans, were adequately alleged, reversing and remanding a lower court's...

Credit Card Suit Against Nordstrom Can Continue, Federal Judge Rules

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A federal judge in California on Oct. 22 refused to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Nordstrom Inc. violated the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1974 by requesting customers' email addresses to send unsolicited marketing materials, predicting that the California...

Judge Again Finds IPhone Owners Lack Standing To Bring Antitrust Claims

OAKLAND, Calif. - For the second time, a California federal judge on Dec. 2 dismissed a putative antitrust class action against Apple Inc., finding that the plaintiff consumers failed to establish standing as direct purchasers to assert antitrust violations related to Apple's sale of iPhone applications...

11th Circuit Upholds Rejection Of Suit Over Travel Companies' Tax Collection

ATLANTA - More than 250 Georgia cities and counties failed to prove that online travel companies (OTCs) collected excess taxes and now owe the localities back taxes, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Dec. 13, also upholding a district court's sanctions ruling against the class of localities...