The Commission instituted proceedings against UBS Puerto
Rico and two of its former senior executives alleging that misrepresentations
were made in connection with the sale of shares in non-exchange traded closed
end funds about the pricing and the market. The action involving UBS Puerto
Rico or UBS PR settled. In the Matter of UBS Financial Services Inc. of
Puerto Rico, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-14863 (Filed May 1, 2012). The
proceeding against Respondents Miguel A. Ferrer, former CEO of UBS PR, and
Carlos J. Ortiz, former Managing Director of Capital Markets of the subsidiary,
did not. In the Matter of Miguel A. Ferrer, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-14862
(Filed May 1, 2012).
Since 1995 UBS PR, a subsidiary of UBS Financial Services,
Inc., has been the primary underwriter of fourteen separately organized
closed-end companies' shares. Those companies had a market capitalization of
about $4 billion. The firm was also co-managed nine offerings of similar fund
shares. Those had a market capitalization of about $1 billion. The shares in
the funds are not listed on an exchange or quoted by any quotation service.
They are only available to residents of Puerto Rico. The majority of the funds
held Puerto Rico municipal bonds. The firm is the only secondary dealer for the
funds it underwrote. It is the dominant dealer for the others.
Fund share prices were effectively set by the UBS PR head
trader. The firm priced the fund shares to maintain a high premium to net asset
value or NAV throughout 2008 and early 2009. Nevertheless, customers were told
that the prices were set through supply and demand. Those prices were also
listed on the client account statements as "market values." In fact that
statement was false, according to the Order.
The reinvestment program for the funds was an important
sales tool. Under this program investors could elect to receive dividend
reinvestment shares at net asset value or NAV. Those shares could immediately
be resold to UBS PR at the then existing market price which could earn a
premium of up to 45% because of the manner in which the firm priced the fund
By the spring of 2009 the parent firm concluded that the
inventory of fund shares held by UBS PR was too large. The subsidiary was
directed to reduce the inventory because it represented a potential risk to the
firm. Subsequently, UBS PR regularly sold fund shares at prices which were
below those reflected in pending customer sell order. The firm was undercutting
customer orders, effectively preventing them from selling their shares.
From March to September 2009 UBS PR sold about 75% of its
inventory to investors. Throughout the period the firm continued to
misrepresent the manner in which it set secondary market prices and the
liquidity of the market. The firm also did not disclose that it was withdrawing
support from the market. By fall, when the inventory reduction was completed,
market prices of certain funds declined by 10 - 15%. The Order as to the firm
alleges violations of Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections
10(b) and 15(c).
The firm settled, consenting to the entry of a cease and
desist order based on the Sections cited in the Order as well as to a censure.
In addition, to complying with its undertakings, the firm agreed to pay
disgorgement of $11.5 million along with prejudgment interest and a civil
penalty of $14 million.
The Order as to the two executives, alleges violations of
Securities Act Section 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) and Exchange Act Section 10(b). It
also claims that Messrs. Ferrer and Oritz substantially assisted UBS PR's
principal violations and willfully aided and abetted those violations. That
action is proceeding to hearing.
For more cutting edge commentary on
developing securities issues, visit SEC Actions, a
blog by Thomas Gorman.
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.