WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) The U.S. investment banking
subsidiary of Japan-based Mizuho Financial Group will pay $127.5 million to
settle claims that it provided "dummy assets" to a ratings agency "that
inaccurately reflected the collateral held" by a hybrid collateralized debt
obligation (CDO) Mizuho structured, marketed and rated in violation of federal
securities law, according to a press release filed by the SEC on July 18 (U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mizuho Securities USA, Inc., S.D.
According to the press release, Mizuho Securities USA
Inc. "consented to the entry of a final judgment requiring payment of $10
million in disgorgement, $2.5 million in prejudgment interest, and a $115
"The settlement, which requires court approval, also
permanently enjoins Mizuho from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the
Securities Act," according to the press release.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,
naming Mizuho as the lone defendant.
The SEC alleges that Mizuho structured, marketed and
rated the Delphinus CDO 2007-1, which was backed by subprime bonds, and
provided inaccurate information to ratings agency Standard & Poor's
According to the press release, once Mizuho received a
favorable rating from S&P, "it sold the notes to investors using the
misleading ratings" and made approximately $10 million in structuring and
Securities Act Claims
Claims for violation of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the
Securities Act of 1933 were made, and the SEC sought injunctive relief,
disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, civil penalties and other
Mizuho eventually defaulted in 2008 and was liquidated in
In related action, the SEC also announced in the press
release that it has settled administrative proceedings with "the three former
Mizuho employees responsible for the Delphinus deal, Alexander Rekeda headed
the group that structured the $1.6 billion CDO, Xavier Capdepon modeled the
transaction for the rating agencies, and Gwen Snorteland was the transaction
manager responsible for structuring and closing Delphinus. Delaware Asset
Advisers (DAA) served as Delphinus's collateral manager and the DAA portfolio
manager was Wei (Alex) Wei."
According to the press release, SEC found that "Rekeda
violated Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act, and Capdepon and
Snorteland violated Section 17(a). Rekeda and Capdepon each agreed to pay
a $125,000 penalty, while the decision on whether there will be a penalty for Snorteland
will be decided at a later date. Rekeda agreed to be suspended from the
securities industry for 12 months, Capdepon and Snorteland each agreed to be
barred from the securities industry for one year, and all three agreed to cease
and desist from further violations of the respective sections of the Securities
Act they violated."
"In the related administrative proceedings against
Rekeda, Capdepon, and Snorteland, the SEC instituted settled administrative
proceedings against DAA and Wei based on their post-closing conduct. DAA
consented to the entry of an order requiring the firm to pay disgorgement of
$2,228,372, prejudgment interest of $357,776, and a penalty of
$2,228,372. Wei consented to the entry of an order requiring him to pay a
$50,000 penalty and suspending him from associating with any investment adviser
for six months. Both DAA and Wei consented to cease and desist from
violating Section 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 206(2) of
the Advisers Act," according to the press release.
Each of the defendants that was charged by the SEC agreed
to settlements without admitting or denying the charges.
The SEC is represented by Kenneth R. Lench, Reid A.
Muoio, Robert E. Leidenheimer Jr., Lawrence C. Renbaum and James F. Murtha of
the SEC in Washington.
Mealey's is now available in eBook
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.