LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Mandatory Provisions—Not in My State—McCarran-Ferguson, the FAA, and Reverse Preemption

By John E. James and Michael B. Rush, Attorneys, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP In their article appearing in the May/June 2011 issue of Coverage , "Mandatory Provisions-Not in My State-McCarran-Ferguson, the FAA, and Reverse Preemption," John E. James and Michael B. Rush examine how...

Foley & Lardner: Avoiding Problems With Arbitrator Disclosures: Practical Lessons From Karlseng v. Cooke

By Eric Haab , Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP For many decades, the reinsurance marketplace has adopted arbitration as the preferred mode of dispute resolution. The expressed goals of arbitration are familiar - timely and efficient resolution of disputes by a panel of experts familiar with the intricacies...

Split High Court: California Appeals Court Must Enforce Arbitration Agreement

WASHINGTON, D.C. — (Mealey’s) A California appellate panel erred when it refused to enforce an arbitration clause contained in a cable provider’s customer agreement, a divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled this morning, finding that the appellate panel’s interpretation was preempted...