LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Emerging Issues Analysis: SNR Denton on New York Marine & General Insurance Co. V, Lafarge v. North America, Inc.

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton In New York Marine & General Insurance Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc. (“NYMAGIC”) 593 F.3d 102 (2nd Cir. 2010), the Second Circuit pointed out limits to an insured’s right to be defended by independent counsel, rather than counsel...

American Bar Association Litigation Section Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee Mid-Winter Meeting

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton This meeting occurred in Tucson, Arizona, March 2-5, 2011, and was attended by over 350 registrants from both sides of the coverage bar (and some judges, professors, mediators, and providers of litigation services). The presentations were high quality. There...

Arizona Appeals Court Takes Different Tack In Addressing Independent Counsel Fees

Will The Decision Now Go From Phoenix, Arizona All The Way To Tacoma, Philadelphia, Atlanta, L.A.? "I say put money in thy purse." Othello Act 1, scene 3 Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams, LLP Don't be fooled by the Shakespeare quote. I'm not that smart. I wouldn't...

SNR Denton on Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.: Does a Right to Independent Counsel Entitle the Policyholder to Two Lawyers?

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Insurance Co. addressed the novel question whether an policyholder entitled to independent counsel could both accept representation by the counsel selected by the insurer and insist on payment of its own selected counsel as co...

New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition - § 16.04: The Tripartite Relationship Among the Insured, the Insurer and Insurer-Directed Defense Counsel

Section 16.04 of New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition deals with the relationship that exists between insureds, their insurers, and the insurer-directed legal counsel that insurers provide to their insureds. You can download a free copy of this section by clicking on the link below. Section...

SNR Denton, US, LLP on Downhole Navigator, LLC v. Nautilus Insurance Co.: Fifth Circuit Concludes That Texas No Longer Allows a Policyholder to Demand Independent Counsel Merely Because the Insurer Offers a Defense under Reservation of Rights

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton Older Texas cases had indicated that, whenever a liability insurer offered a defense under reservation of rights, the insured was entitled to demand defense by independent counsel, at the insurer's expense. In Downhole Navigator, LLC v. Nautilus Insurance...

Insurer Has No Duty to Pay for Independent Counsel and May Reassert Its Right to Control the Defense When the Insurer Withdraws the Reservation of Rights Triggering the Insured’s Right to Independent Counsel

Swanson v. State Farm General Insurance Co., 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 759 [ enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers ], presented an issue of first impression regarding whether an insurer has a duty to provide an insured with independent counsel, pursuant to California Civil Code section 2860...

"Non-Trivial Probability" of Excess Judgment Obligates Insurer to Pay for Independent Defense Counsel

The court in Perma-Pipe, Inc. v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation , Case No. 13 C 2989, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54867 (N.D. Ill. April 21, 2014), [ enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers ], held that a CGL insurer breached its duty to defend by refusing to pay for independent defense...

A Win For Insurers: Nevada Supreme Court Adopts “Cumis” Rule

Tapas: Small Dishes of Insurance Coverage News & Notes Answering a Certified Question from a Nevada District Court, the Supreme Court of Nevada held as follows in State Farm v. Hansen, No. 64484 (Nev. Sept. 24, 2015), [subscribers can access an enhanced version of this opinion: lexis.com | Lexis...

Nevada Adopts Cumis Independent Counsel Rule; Holds Reservation of Rights Is Not a Per Se Conflict

The Nevada Supreme Court has adopted the "Cumis" independent counsel doctrine first adopted in California more than 30 years ago. In State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hansen , 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 74 (9/24/2015), [subscribers can access an enhanced version of this opinion: lexis.com | Lexis Advance...