Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
The Montana Supreme Court held that the Department erred in determining that Exxon Mobil was entitled to only an 80% exclusion for dividends received from domestic corporations excluded from the water’s-edge combined return, and concluded that 100% of the actual dividends it received from such entities are excluded from income. Pursuant to Montana statute, Exxon Mobil excluded certain domestic subsidiaries that have less than 20% domestic payroll and property from the combined return (“80/20 corporations”). Also, under IRC § 243 dividend deduction rules it excluded from the combined return income, 100% of dividends actually received from these entities. The court stated that unlike certain types of deemed distribution income, Montana statute did not address the treatment of dividends actually received from 80/20 corporations and Montana statute does not expressly prohibit the IRC § 243 dividend deduction. The court reasoned that unless the legislature expressly provided otherwise, a corporation is entitled to federal deductions for purposes of computing its Montana tax liability.
Exxon Mobile Corporation v. Montana Department of Revenue, 2019 MT 156 (July 9, 2019)