A New York appellate court recently held that an employer does not forfeit the exclusivity defense in third-party actions for indemnification or contribution filed against it on the basis that the employer hired an undocumented alien. The third-party plaintiff contended that the employer should not be able to enjoy the protections of N.Y. Work. Comp. Law § 11 (the exclusive remedy provision), after violating the Immigration Reform and Control Act (8 USC § 1324a). While the court was somewhat sympathetic, indicating that ordinarily a party should not be able to take advantage of a wrong, it countered that it was not enforcing or recognizing rights arising from an illegal oral employment contract between the employer and the undocumented workers. The undocumented workers enjoyed the benefit of the workers’ compensation laws; the employer should as well.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Microtech Contracting Corp., 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 170 (Feb. 13, 2014) [2014 N.Y. LEXIS 170 (Feb. 13, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 121.03 [121.03]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
Price $99*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice.