Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Affirming a decision of a federal district court, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the United States could assert the exclusive-remedy provision of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act [Tex. Lab. Code § 408.001(a)] against an injured contractor's worker since under the contract, the contractor was required to, and did, provide workers' compensation coverage to the worker. The U.S. was a “statutory employer” under state law and was shielded from liability. The district court, therefore, did not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claims.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Willoughby v. United States, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19191 (5th. Cir., Sept. 17, 2013) [2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19191 (5th Cir., Sept. 17, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 111.04 [111.04]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site