The new collective bargaining agreement that has been approved by the National Football League owners and the National Football League Players Association includes a provision that a player can file worker's compensation claims in states besides the state in which his team is based. Read more at Business Insurance.
In addition, a new Emerging Issues Analysis article by Thomas A. Robinson, the senior staff writer for Larson's Workers' Compensation Law, examines the collision of states' jurisdiction in workers' compensation cases, particularly where injured pro football players are involved. California is a popular destination for professional football players, at least for players who are seeking workers' compensation benefits. The generosity of the California system has encouraged hundreds of NFL players to file claims there, even when they played for teams who were located in other states.
Some states, including Florida, exclude professional athletes from their workers' compensation systems, and now Florida has sought to prevent athletes who were under contract with Florida teams from pursuing workers' compensation benefits in California or other states.
The Florida legislature thought it had found a way to keep players in Florida from scoring in the California workers' compensation end zone. But as Thomas A. Robinson writes, there could be a potential flaw in the Florida legislation, and the California courts may well review the new Florida reciprocity statute and find it doesn't apply to Florida pro football players. Moreover, as the recent Maryland case Pro-Football, Inc. v. Tupa shows, the state where the injury occurs will not easily give up jurisdiction over the injury claim.
You can purchase this article, Thomas A. Robinson on Did Florida Legislature Fumble in Trying to Limit Workers' Compensation Coverage for Pro Football Players?, at the LexisNexis Bookstore.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.