A Tennessee appellate court recently reversed a trial court’s determination of an injured employee’s average weekly wage, finding that the court erred in failing to include in its computation the time periods during which the employee was laid off [see Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(3)(A)] because of the seasonal nature of the employer’s business. Noting that the employer's layoffs were the result of a market-driven force and they were recognized incidents of the employee's regular employment, the appellate court found that the employee’s lost time was not a “fortuitous circumstance” such that the employee was entitled to deduct the layoffs from the calculation of her AWW. The court observed that during each of the two years prior to her injury, the employee was laid off for as many as seven consecutive. The lost time was, therefore, a regular incident of the employment.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Houston v. MTD Consumer Group, Inc., 2013 Tenn. LEXIS 860 (Oct. 25, 2013) [2013 Tenn. LEXIS 860 (Oct. 25, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 93.01 [93.01]
Special Discount Price $79*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
PROMO CODE: WCEIA
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice. Discount cannot be combined with other offers. Expires 12/31/2013.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site