Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
While procedural rules are often relaxed in workers’ compensation cases, the six-month statute of limitations provided in W. Va. Code § 23-4-15(a) is jurisdictional, held West Virginia’s Supreme Court of Appeals in a memorandum decision. Where a teacher filed his workers’ compensation claim 11 months after his alleged work-related injury, his filing was untimely under the statute. He argued that extenuating circumstances existed that should excuse his untimely filing. There had been a teachers’ strike. He contended he feared that he might lose his job by filing a claim. The Court said the record clearly established his filing had not been timely. The Legislature had not provided any exceptions to the jurisdictional requirements for workers’ compensation claims.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Foltz v. Berkeley County Bd. of Educ., 2021 W. Va. LEXIS 511 (Oct. 4, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 124.01.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.