LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
California: The Right to Select the Specialty of the Panel QME: Whose Choice Is It Anyways?

Lexis.com subscribers can link to the citations below. Prior to the passage of Senate Bill 899, both sides maintained the right to select their own QME. Inherent in the use of “battling QME’s” was also the right to decide what type of specialist a party would utilize. Where a back...

California: The Right to Select the Specialty of the Panel QME: Whose Choice Is It Anyways?

Lexis.com subscribers can link to the citations below. Prior to the passage of Senate Bill 899, both sides maintained the right to select their own QME. Inherent in the use of “battling QME’s” was also the right to decide what type of specialist a party would utilize. Where a back...

California: Top 25 Noteworthy Panel Decisions (July–December 2015)

LexisNexis has picked the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2015. The list features a number of decisions addressing the assignment and reporting of panel qualified medical evaluators...

Pennsylvania: WCJ’s Rejection of Uncontradicted Medical Evidence Offered by IRE Physician Was Appropriate

Emphasizing that with regard to expert medical testimony, one should not conflate the qualifications of the expert with the persuasiveness of the expert’s testimony, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed a decision by the state’s Commonwealth Court and held that a WCJ’s rejection...