In July 2012, the National Labor Relations Board held
that a blanket approach and policy requiring confidentiality during all
internal workplace investigations violates employees' concerted activity rights
under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). As a result,
employers were encouraged to review and modify, where appropriate, all internal
investigation policies, procedures and forms to determine whether there are
nondiscretionary requirements that employees always be instructed to maintain
confidentiality of workplace investigations. You can read more about the July
2012 NLRB decision here.
This week, the NLRB released an Advice
Memorandum that provides additional clarification on its position on
confidentiality in workplace investigations. Obviously, an Advice
Memorandum does not have the same precedential value as a NLRB decision.
Advice Memoranda are helpful nonetheless as employers who follow the guidance
provided in them can generally avoid prosecution by the NLRB. As such,
it's helpful to review the guidance, especially since in this instance the NLRB
has provided specific approved language for employer policies on
confidentiality in internal workplace investigations.
First, let's look at the language in the employer's
existing Code of Conduct that the NLRB found objectionable:
"[Employer] has a compelling interest in protecting the
integrity of its investigations. In every investigation, [Employer] has a
strong desire to protect witnesses from harassment, intimidation and
retaliation, to keep evidence from being destroyed, to ensure that testimony is
not fabricated, and to prevent a cover-up. To assist [Employer] in
achieving these objectives, we must maintain the investigation and our role in
it in strict confidence. If we do not maintain such confidentiality, we
may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including immediate
The NLRB found the employer's blanket rule on
confidentiality in internal investigations overly broad and in violation of
Section 7 of the NLRA. The good news for employers is that the NLRB
didn't just stop there. It went on to offer suggested alternative
language that would be in compliance with Section 7 of the NLRA.
Specifically, the NLRB suggested that the last two sentences of the above be
revised as follows:
"[Employer] may decide in some circumstances that in
order to achieve these objectives, we must maintain the investigation and our
role in it in strict confidence. If [Employer] reasonably imposes such a
requirement and we do not maintain such confidentiality, we may be subject to
disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination."
Insight for Employers
Confidentiality continues to be a critical aspect of the
vast majority of internal workplace investigations. It is critical for
any number of reasons, including the reasons identified in the above
policy: protecting witnesses from harassment, intimidation and
retaliation, keeping evidence from being destroyed, ensuring that testimony is
not fabricated, and preventing cover-ups.
As such, it is imperative that employers be able to
lawfully enforce their confidentiality policies and practices when the need
arises. From a pragmatic perspective, employers will also want to avoid
the productivity drain caused by a NLRB inquiry. To meet these goals,
employers are encouraged to review their existing policies and practices and
modify the language, as appropriate, to mirror the NLRB's suggested language.
Employers may also wish to implement a practice of documenting, on a
case-by-case basis, the reasons for deciding to instruct witnesses to keep an
more articles about managing workplace conflict at Win-Win HR, a blog by
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.