![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]>
Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Well you can never accuse me of being a good newsman! A
short report in our industry trade publication surprised all. Nasdaq apparently
was requesting a 6-month wait for all post-reverse merged companies to uplist
to Nasdaq. During the 6 months they must trade over the counter at least at
$4.00 a share, and the company must have completed several periodic filings
with the SEC. Well they are indeed requesting this, and one friend has
already dubbed it the "seasoning" requirement. However, I have finally
gotten a copy of the actual proposal, and while I haven't finished it, I
stopped to report to you when I saw that the 6-month wait will not be necessary
if a company is proposing to move to Nasdaq through a firm commitment,
underwritten public offering. This is the method by which WRASP or "re-IPO"
transactions are completed, and so it appears those would be able to continue
I still feel strongly that this proposal is ill-advised
and frankly does not even serve the interests it appears Nasdaq is trying to
protect. But if it permits uplisting in the manner that most have pursued
in recent years, that is some solace. I will try to get through the rest of the
proposal and report soon. And to make clear to the many who have been calling,
emailing and telexing me, this is just a proposal currently, is not in force
and will not be unless the SEC approves it.
For additional insights on reverse mergers,
SPACs, other alternatives to traditional initial public offerings, the small
and microcap markets and the economy, visit the Reverse Merger and
SPAC Blog by David N. Feldman, Esq., Partner of Richardson &
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.