Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

CA5 on DACA (Oct. 5, 2022)

October 05, 2022 (1 min read)

Texas v. USA

"The legal questions that DACA presents are serious, both to the parties and to the public. In our view, the defendants have not shown that there is a likelihood that they will succeed on the merits. But we are mindful that, in the similar DAPA case, the Supreme Court was equally divided over our judgment. We also recognize that DACA has had profound significance to recipients and many others in the ten years since its adoption.  Given the “uncertainty of final disposition”249 and the “inevitable disruption that would arise from a lack of continuity and stability,” we preserve the stay as to existing recipients. * * * The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part. This case is REMANDED to the district court, rather than DHS. The motion for a partial stay is GRANTED pending a further order of this court or the Supreme Court."

Tags: