Arizona v. Garland "This is a challenge by 19 states to an administrative action of the Executive Branch establishing a new procedure for adjudicating asylum applications under federal immigration...
Moran v. Mayorkas "At the time of Mr. Valadez Moran's birth, it is more likely than not that his mother, Ms. Moran, was a citizen of the United States by virtue of her birth in Elsa, Texas on...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/19/2024 "Notice of a Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC) between the Government of the United States and the Government of Japan...
Courtesy of AILA; AILA Doc. 24022603 "The Department of State’s Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Consular Affairs (L/CA), in coordination with the Visa Office in the Bureau of Consular...
Abdulahad v. Garland "Walid Abdulahad petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the “Board”) denial of his motion to reopen based on changed country conditions...
Leland E. Beck writes: "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Labor (DOL) moved quickly – perhaps too quickly – to resolve legal authority issues raised by recent court decisions vacating low-skilled worker visa (H-2B) regulations by adopting a “joint” interim final rules (IFR) that is available for public inspection and will be published in tomorrow’s Federal Register. Recent court decisions vacated specific prior rules and affirmed a preliminary injunction that held that DOL had no authority to promulgate H-2B regulations at all. The IFR to be published tomorrow tries to resolve those issues through promulgation by the agency that clearly has authority, but the methods used to promulgate the rule raise more questions, and, in reality, the agency with authority is not promulgating such a rule. ... Nowhere does DHS make it clear that it may “delegate” regulatory authority to DOL or that such a redelegation of statutory authority is lawful, not a reorganization, and consistent with limitations on appropriations. DOL’s promulgation of a regulation reasserts the authority that was denied by the 11th Circuit in Bayou Lawn & Landscaping. This hasty remodeling does not accomplish a satisfactory result but reiterates the Department of Justice (DOJ)’s assertion that the Bayou Lawn & Landscaping preliminary injunction – and apparently the 11th Circuit – was wrong."