Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
New York, NY (August 5, 2014) -- The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department reaffirmed on July 31, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], that several insurance companies providing insurance coverage to TransCanada cannot claim attorney-client privilege for communications with outside counsel employed in claims-handling.
A four-judge panel of the Appellate Division unanimously denied a motion by Factory Mutual Insurance Company, National Union (an AIG subsidiary), ACE INA, and Arch for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. The court simultaneously issued a new order upholding its prior order of February 25, 2014, which in turn upheld the trial court’s ruling denying privilege.
The underlying decision held that pre-denial documents generated as part of an insurance company’s determination as to whether to pay or deny a claim are not shielded from disclosure just because they were prepared by counsel. The trial court had conducted an in camera review of the documents and ruled that while some documents were privileged, the majority were not protected by either the attorney-client or work product privileges and had to be produced.
In its July 31, 2014 order, the Appellate Division ruled:
The record shows that counsel were primarily engaged in claims handling -- an ordinary business activity for an insurance company. Documents prepared in the ordinary course of an insurer's investigation of whether to pay or deny a claim are not privileged, and do not become so "merely because [the] investigation was conducted by an attorney" (see Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. American Home Assur. Co., 23 A.D.3d 190, 191 [1st Dept 2005]), [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers].
Anderson Kill shareholder Pamela D. Hans, counsel to TransCanada, commented, "The Appellate Division unanimously upheld the vital principle that insurance companies may not shield their claims-handling documents from discovery by employing counsel in the claims-handling process."
John Nevius, John O’Connor, Pamela Hans, Kerry Sheehan, and Carrie DiCanio are counsel for TransCanada.
About Anderson Kill
Anderson Kill practices law in the areas of Insurance Recovery, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, Estate, Trusts and Tax Services, Corporate and Securities, Antitrust, Banking and Lending, Bankruptcy and Restructuring, Real Estate and Construction, Foreign Investment Recovery, Public Law, Government Affairs, Employment and Labor Law, Captive Insurance, Intellectual Property, Corporate Tax, Hospitality, and Health Reform. Recognized nationwide by Chambers USA for Client Service and Commercial Awareness, and best-known for its work in insurance recovery, the firm represents policyholders only in insurance coverage disputes - with no ties to insurance companies and has no conflicts of interest. Clients include Fortune 1000 companies, small and medium-sized businesses, governmental entities, and nonprofits as well as personal estates. Based in New York City, the firm also has offices in Ventura, CA, Dallas, TX, Stamford, CT, Washington, DC, Newark, NJ and Philadelphia, PA.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site