Insurance Law

Recent Posts

Florida Appeals Court Squeezes Insurers: Must Appoint Separate Counsel For Each Insured
Posted on 27 Feb 2013 by Randy J. Maniloff

By Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams, LLP Court Creates Sunshine State For Defense Counsel It is a question that I get asked regularly from clients: We have a duty to defend and there are four insureds (or any number greater than one)... Read More

Nevada Adopts Cumis Independent Counsel Rule; Holds Reservation of Rights Is Not a Per Se Conflict
Posted on 3 Nov 2015 by Andrew B. Downs

The Nevada Supreme Court has adopted the "Cumis" independent counsel doctrine first adopted in California more than 30 years ago. In State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hansen , 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 74 (9/24/2015), [subscribers can access an enhanced... Read More

A Win For Insurers: Nevada Supreme Court Adopts “Cumis” Rule
Posted on 21 Oct 2015 by Randy J. Maniloff

Tapas: Small Dishes of Insurance Coverage News & Notes Answering a Certified Question from a Nevada District Court, the Supreme Court of Nevada held as follows in State Farm v. Hansen, No. 64484 (Nev. Sept. 24, 2015), [subscribers can access an... Read More

DLA Piper: Even In the Absence of a Demand, Do Insurers Have Duty to Pursue Settlement? A Ninth Circuit Panel Says Yes
Posted on 16 Jul 2012 by DLA Piper

By Joseph G. Finnerty III and Aidan M. McCormack, Partners, DLA Piper Confounding most observers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued a decision contradicting established insurance law jurisprudence in nearly every... Read More

Goldberg Segalla’s Reinsurance Review – February, 2011
Posted on 30 Mar 2011 by Gerber, Segalla, Kingsley, Omilian

IN THIS MONTH'S EDITION: Circuit Court Reverses District Court and Determines that there is No Right to Injunction to Stop Arbitration Because No Showing of Irreparable Injury District Court Dismisses Case against British American Sua Sponte... Read More

Duty to Defend – New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition, Chapter 17
Posted on 3 Jun 2010 by Seth Lamden

By Seth D. Lamden, Partner, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP The chapter identifies and discusses many key issues that arise in the context of the duty to defend. This chapter begins in Section 17.01[1][a] with an overview of the scope and purpose... Read More

Insured Entitled To Independent Counsel Even When Being Defended WITHOUT A Reservation Of Rights (Court Rejects ALI Draft Principle)
Posted on 20 May 2014 by Randy J. Maniloff

When it comes to an insured’s right to retain independent counsel, when being defended by its insurer under a reservation of rights, there are some general rules of the road. In a few states a defense provided under a reservation of rights automatically... Read More

Responding to Independent Counsel Arguments Based on R.G. Wegman Construction Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
Posted on 1 Mar 2011 by William T. Barker

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton Counsel for insureds are likely to use the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in R.G. Wegman Construction Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 679 (Jan. 14, 2011), as a basis to argue for broader... Read More

New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition Cited by Missouri Supreme Court
Posted on 25 May 2012 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

The Missouri Supreme Court cited the chapter written by Douglas Richmond on agent and broker liability in the New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition several times in Emerson Electric Co. v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., 362 S.W.3d 7 (Mo. 2012) , a... Read More

SNR Denton on Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.: Does a Right to Independent Counsel Entitle the Policyholder to Two Lawyers?
Posted on 21 Dec 2011 by William T. Barker

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Insurance Co. addressed the novel question whether an policyholder entitled to independent counsel could both accept representation by the counsel selected by the insurer and insist... Read More

New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition - § 16.04: The Tripartite Relationship Among the Insured, the Insurer and Insurer-Directed Defense Counsel
Posted on 22 Dec 2011 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

Section 16.04 of New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition deals with the relationship that exists between insureds, their insurers, and the insurer-directed legal counsel that insurers provide to their insureds. You can download a free copy of this... Read More

SNR Denton on Weitz Co. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.: Is an Insurer a Co-Client of Defense Counsel It Retains to Defend an Insured?
Posted on 12 Sep 2011 by William T. Barker

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton The Colorado federal district court in Weitz Co. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. concluded that a Colorado liability insurer is not a client of defense counsel for its insured. That was correct on the facts... Read More

New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition - § 16.04: The Tripartite Relationship Among the Insured, the Insurer and Insurer-Directed Defense Counsel
Posted on 22 Dec 2011 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

Section 16.04 of New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition deals with the relationship that exists between insureds, their insurers, and the insurer-directed legal counsel that insurers provide to their insureds. You can download a free copy of this... Read More

New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition Cited by Missouri Supreme Court
Posted on 25 May 2012 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

The Missouri Supreme Court cited the chapter written by Douglas Richmond on agent and broker liability in the New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition several times in Emerson Electric Co. v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., 362 S.W.3d 7 (Mo. 2012) , a... Read More