![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]>
Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
For today's consumer
goods product developer, counterfeiting is a huge concern. An essential part of
any campaign against counterfeit goods is Internet enforcement. In this
Analysis, David Starr and Gregory Bennett focus on the details of establishing
and maintaining an effective approach to Business-to-Business enforcement to
severely limit the volume of counterfeit goods finding their way to our shores
and into the consumer market. They write:
B2Bs Notice and Takedown Procedures
websites are nothing new. Nor are they inherently evil. On the other hand, as
platforms for independent, generally unscreened third-parties to host pages and
list offerings of goods, the B2B websites are frequently and ever-increasingly
host to vast counterfeiting. Fortunately, however, most of these websites have
implemented formal procedures for requesting the takedown of allegedly
infringing links ("Notice and Takedown"). The Notice and Takedown processes are
modeled on the procedures established by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
("DMCA"). As its name suggests, the DMCA relates to copyright infringement
requests, but the B2B websites have instituted the procedures for trademark and
patent infringement as well.
how the Notice and Takedown process generally works: you find a link that you
believe contains infringing material, be it based on your trademark, copyright,
or patent rights. You submit a takedown request along with the allegedly
infringing link and proof of your supporting IPR. The B2B team will review the
link based on your claim, and if they agree, they will remove the link. They
will also notify the company who posted the link and provide them an
opportunity to show why the link did not contain infringing material.
Oftentimes, the B2B will also have a policy that will suspend or ban repeat
Beyond Notice and Takedown: Turning Up The Temperature
are sometimes slow to react or truculent regarding blocking repeat offenders.
When frustrations come to a head, consider alternative approaches to improve
contacting the B2B's General Counsel office directly will turn up the temperature
in a hurry. In so proceeding, it is important to distinguish the B2B's
activities from Ebay's activities in the landmark ruling in Tiffany (NJ)
Inc. v. Ebay, Inc. [2010
U.S. App. LEXIS 6735 (2d Cir. N.Y. Apr. 1, 2010)] On appeal, Ebay was held free of contributory
trademark liability in spite of the rampant counterfeiting Tiffany was battling
on the auction giant's site. The key to the decision was that Ebay had no
specific knowledge that any given listing was counterfeit and thus had no duty
to remove such links before being asked to do so by Tiffany.
the full version of Alibaba and the Forty Thousand Thieves: Combating
Counterfeiting on B2B websites with your lexis.com ID. Additional fees may be incurred.
(approx. 6 pages)
If you do not have a lexis.com ID, you can purchase the
Emerging Issues Analysis content through our lexisONE Research Packages