Legal NewsRoom
Menu
Menu
LEGAL NEWS
HOT TOPICS
LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
ACA and Healthcare Reform
Antitrust and Unfair Competition
Banking and Finance
Bankruptcy
California
Climate Change
Constitutional Law and Civil Rights
Consumer Protection & Privacy
Contracts and Commercial Law
Corporate
Criminal Law and Procedure
Energy
Environmental
Estate and Elder Law
Family Law
Financial Fraud Law
Florida
Fracking and Alternative Energy
Health Care
Hot Topics
Hurricane Sandy
Illinois
Immigration Law
Immigration Reform
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International Law
International Trade
Labor and Employment Law
Law360
Legal Business
Lexis® Hub
Litigation
Mealeys
Media and Entertainment
Mergers and Acquisitions
New Jersey
New York
Pennsylvania
Public Contracts
Public media
Public Policy
Real Estate Law
Securities
Sports Law
Tax Law
Technology
Texas
Top Emerging Trends
Torts
Virtual Currency
Workers' Compensation
NEWS & INSIGHT
Blogs and Newsletters
BIZ Blog
Blog Mosaic
Business of Law Blog
Corporate Law Advisory
Legal Content Insider
LexTalk
State Net
®
Capitol Journal
News & Trending Topics
Law360
Legal Insights & Trends
Lexis Practice Advisor Journal
Professional Communities
Business Insight Solutions – Partner Portal
Corporate InfoPro (Corporate Information Professionals)
InfoPro (Legal Information Professionals)
LexisNexis
®
for Developers
Litigators Verdict & Settlement Exchange
VISIT LEXISNEXIS LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL
Search
Search
Please enter a Keyword
This should not be used for legal research but instead can be used to find solutions that will help you do legal research.
Sign In
Browse By Tags
aggravated felony
ca2
ca4
coram nobis
Fourth Circuit
prosecutorial discretion
ragland
Daniel M. Kowalski
over 10 years ago
Immigration Law
Inside News
CA2 on (M)(i) aggravated felony: Akinsade v. Holder
"We hold that because none of the facts to which Akinsade actually and necessarily pleaded to establish the elements of his embezzlement offense reveals whether that offense was committed with a specific intent to defraud, it was error for the BIA...
Daniel M. Kowalski
over 10 years ago
Immigration Law
Inside News
CA4 on Coram Nobis, Ineffective Assistance: U.S. v. Akinsade
"Appellant Temitope Akinsade appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 claiming that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when he plead guilty to embezzlement...
Daniel M. Kowalski
over 10 years ago
Immigration Law
Inside News
CA2 Slaps OIL for PD Posture: Akinsade v. Holder
"[W]e pause to express a concern, unrelated to the grounds on which we resolve this appeal. At argument, we asked the government, for informational purposes, whether Akinsade’s case might be one in which relief from prosecution would be exercised...