Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Construing the state’s intentional tort exception to workers' compensation immunity (§ 440.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat.), a Florida appellate court recently affirmed a trial court’s entry of final summary judgment in favor of plaintiff’s statutory employer. The court indicated the record conclusively demonstrated that there were no prior similar accidents or a specific warning explicitly identifying a known danger, that would establish that the statutory employer engaged in conduct it knew was “virtually certain to result in injury or death” to the plaintiff-construction worker. The court added that the unrefuted evidence also demonstrated that the danger or risk was apparent to plaintiff; there was no concealment or misrepresentation by defendant. Since the worker could not establish as a matter of law that the intentional tort exception to workers' compensation immunity was applicable, summary judgment was appropriate.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Figueroa v. Delant Constr. Co., 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11616 (July 24, 2013) [2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11616 (July 24, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 103.04 [103.04]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site