Workers' Compensation

Recent Posts

Kansas: Marijuana Test Results Should Have Been Admitted into Evidence
Posted on 21 Feb 2019 by Thomas A. Robinson

Reiterating that in Kansas, because of multiple concerns, the rules of evidence do not apply to workers’ compensation hearings, a Kansas appellate court held the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board should not have excluded the results... Read More

United States: No Private Right of Action in Florida’s Drug-Free Workplace Program Statute
Posted on 18 Jan 2019 by Thomas A. Robinson

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a Florida job applicant, who was required to take a drug test, but then offered no actual position, may not maintain a civil action against the prospective employer under Florida’s Drug-Free... Read More

The Impact of OSHA Developments on Workers’ Comp: Ch-ch-changes (Turn and Face the Shame)
Posted on 24 Aug 2015 by Karen C. Yotis

Warning Employers About a New Enforcement Paradigm By Karen C. Yotis, Esq., Feature Resident Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter Something’s afoot at the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, and... Read More

Kansas: Providing Inadequate Urine Sample is Not Refusal to Take a Drug Test
Posted on 2 Feb 2017 by Thomas A. Robinson

The term “refusal,” as it is used in Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44–501(b)(1)(E)(2012), carries with it an element of willfulness, indicated a state appellate court recently. Accordingly, where an injured Kansas worker was unable to provide... Read More

Kansas Recent Drug Test Case and Its Implications for Employers
Posted on 1 Mar 2017 by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Newsroom Staff

Court held that providing an inadequate urine sample is not a refusal to take a drug test In Byers v. Acme Foundry, 2017 Kan. App. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 27, 2017), a Kansas appellate court recently held that the term “refusal,” as it is used in... Read More

The Drug Law Evolution and The Workplace
Posted on 14 Aug 2014 by Roger Rabb

The proverbial sky could fall soon for drug testing and drug policies Since 1970, marijuana has been listed as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, making the possession and usage of marijuana illegal under federal... Read More

Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Medical Marijuana-Smoking Dish Employee
Posted on 17 Jun 2015 by Albert B. Randall Jr.

June 15, 2015 No. 13SC394, Coats v. Dish Network In a highly anticipated decision, the Supreme Court of Colorado unanimously held this week that an employer may justifiably terminate an employee for his off-duty conduct, despite the employee’s... Read More

Ohio: Worker May Receive TTD Benefits In Spite of Positive Drug Test After Injury
Posted on 6 Jan 2017 by Thomas A. Robinson

The Supreme Court of Ohio, in a divided decision, held that a worker who tested positive for marijuana after seeking medical treatment for a work-related injury was nevertheless eligible for TTD benefits in spite of the fact that he had been fired after... Read More

Section 2353 Extravaganza In Delaware: A Forfeiture Based On Both Intoxication and Failure To Use a Safety Device
Posted on 14 Apr 2015 by Cassandra Roberts

It’s in the bag—urine that is. And can you even begin to guess why this claimant was wearing a bag of urine? I will let the ever-victorious Cheryl Ward tell it (eventually), but before I do, I just cannot contain myself--this case is a veritable... Read More

Federal: Former Employee’s Retaliatory Discharge Action for Refusing Drug Test Associated with Comp Claim Fails
Posted on 21 Feb 2014 by Larson's Spotlight

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a federal district court’s summary judgment in favor of a former employer was appropriate in a discharged employee’s retaliatory discharge action, arising from the latter’s refusal... Read More

Proud Mary Rocks New Year’s Eve…..and the Intoxication Defense is Upheld in Delaware
Posted on 30 Dec 2015 by Cassandra Roberts

Harken back to my post of 4/14/15- “Section 2353 Extravaganza….” . That was the Roger Johnson v. R.C. Fabricators case which dealt with a Section 2353(b) forfeiture defense by virtue of intoxication, involving an injured worker with... Read More

Contract for Hire in California, Drug Testing, Corporate Umbrella: Cal. Comp. Cases January Advanced Postings (1/4/2014)
Posted on 4 Jan 2014 by California Compensation Cases Staff

Here’s the first batch of advanced postings for the January 2014 issue of Cal. Comp. Cases. Lexis.com and Lexis Advance subscribers can link to the case to read the complete headnotes and summaries . © Copyright 2014 LexisNexis. All rights... Read More

CWCI Report Examines Growth of Drug Testing in California Workers’ Comp
Posted on 12 Oct 2015 by California Workers' Compensation Institute

A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study quantifies the growing use and cost of drug tests performed on California injured workers in conjunction with the expanded use opioid painkillers, reveals shifts in the types of tests... Read More

Missouri Skips the Light Fandango Denying Comp Drug Penalty
Posted on 21 Jan 2015 by Martin Klug

The Commission affirmed a denial of an anti-drug policy defense to a permanent total claimant who appeared to have used cocaine shortly before the accident. Hertzing v Beck Motors , 2015 Mo WCLR Lexis 2 (lexis.com), 2015 Mo WCLR Lexis 2 (Lexis Advance... Read More