This year’s Kroll Fraud and Financial Crime Report found companies are growing increasingly concerned that third parties are driving a higher risk of financial crime. We read through the report to pull...
Millions of companies around the world have been impacted by regulations which mandate them to carry out ESG and human rights due diligence (HRDD in the last few years–or they soon will be. These regulations...
Global companies have been fined hundreds of millions of dollars for alleged compliance breaches in the last year. Whether the allegations against them related to bribery and corruption or breaches of...
From Stricter Sanctions to Broken Supply Chains: What the Ukrainian War has Meant for Third Party Risk Management February 2024 will mark two years since the latest conflict in Ukraine began. As well...
Third parties help companies to deliver their products and services, but they also expose them to regulatory, financial, strategic and reputational risks. In the latest blog in our third party risk series...
A new report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) warns that payments firms and banks in the EU often insufficiently identify and manage the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing, despite the heightened risk of both within the sector. This blog looks at the report’s findings and suggests takeaways for firms, including the need for a comprehensive due diligence process which uses authoritative data and leverages technology.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is a regulatory agency which oversees the banking sector across all EU countries. In a 28-page report released in June, it said that money laundering and terrorist financing risks in the EU’s payments sector “may not be assessed and managed effectively” by financial companies such as banks. Failure to identify and mitigate risks exposes these companies to significant legal, financial, reputational and strategic risks.
The report notes that “payment institutions, as a sector, represent high inherent money laundering/terrorist financing risks”. This applies to the wider financial services sector, particularly banks which facilitate payments across borders. For example, EU banks have recently had to implement enhanced screening of transactions which could circumvent sanctions against Russian entities and individuals.
The EBA identifies risk factors which financial institutions should consider when assessing their exposure to possible money laundering and terrorist financing, including:
Given this heightened risk, the payments and financial sector is heavily regulated within the EU. Under the EU’s Money Laundering Directives, institutions are required to identify, assess, monitor and manage money laundering and terrorist financing risk. The EBA’s report also confirms that firms are advised to take a “risk-based approach” to monitoring for and managing money laundering and terrorist financing risk. This involves assessing which third parties carry a higher risk and applying enhanced due diligence proportionally. Factors that may inform this decision could include a third party’s jurisdiction, their industry, their legal record, their ultimate beneficial ownership, or their association with Politically-Exposed Persons (PEPs).
The EBA’s report also hints at further regulatory developments to come from the EU, as it identifies several weaknesses in the governance structure, including:
This should spur national regulators within EU member states to strengthen their own regulatory framework and enforcement of financial crime, in anticipation of new regulations.
Moreover, in March the European Parliament approved a package of measures against money laundering and terrorist financing. This includes establishing the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority, which has the power to investigate and ensure that companies are complying with AML requirements. It also extends the scope of the EU’s AML regime to cover crypto-asset providers, and specifies rules around beneficial ownership transparency and customer due diligence. Banks must therefore ensure they are keeping up-to-date–and compliant–with regulations.
The EBA’s warning should serve as a reminder to financial companies that their compliance operation must be capable of effectively identifying money laundering and terrorist financing risks, then managing and mitigating them.
Positive steps companies should take include:
The clear takeaway from the EBA’s report is that companies must make it a priority to mitigate the financial, legal, reputational and strategic risks of a compliance failure around money laundering or terrorist financing. The best way to do that is to leverage data and technology to strengthen your due diligence process. This will help you to better detect suspected AML transactions or activities within your business or by a customer, supplier or other third party.
Nexis Solutions helps firms to implement a more efficient and effective due diligence process to identify and mitigate AML risks by providing companies with authoritative data from the most relevant sources, including:
We support firms to deploy technology across these sources to improve their approach to due diligence and risk management. For example:
Email: information@lexisnexis.com
Telephone number:+91 99100 69136