Behind every legal brief, compliance audit, fraud detection system and corporate transaction lies a universal tension: the need to act quickly, but with certainty. To innovate, while maintaining a level...
The Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) has issued a new Practice Directive that directly affects the way bodies corporate and homeowners’ associations (HOAs) must operate. The directive introduces...
Don’t Delay the Deed: Unpacking Section 42(1) and 42(2) Estates Transfers. The essential webinar for anyone involved in estate administration or conveyancing. Transferring immovable property from a...
A renewed approach to navigating foreign national identity verification challenges in South Africa The phenomenon of identity fraud is surging across Africa. In a recent cyberthreat assessment report...
In 2010, Silicon Valley-icon, Marc Andreessen, made a bold prediction: “Software will eat the world.” He wasn’t too wrong. Since this statement, software has certainly revolutionised nearly every industry...
The Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) has issued a new Practice Directive that directly affects the way bodies corporate and homeowners’ associations (HOAs) must operate. The directive introduces stricter compliance standards and clarifies the rights and obligations of stakeholders in community schemes across South Africa.
Why This Matters
Community schemes – from sectional title complexes to estates – manage the shared property and common interests of thousands of South Africans. Disputes in these schemes are often complex, and the CSOS plays a central role in providing accessible dispute resolution and ensuring compliance with legislation.
In practice, this means CSOS can now intervene earlier and more decisively in governance matters, compelling bodies corporate and HOAs to comply with legislation and scheme rules before disputes escalate.
Key Areas of Focus
The directive addresses:
Practical Implications
For trustees, directors, and managing agents, the directive means greater accountability. Non-compliance could expose schemes to disputes, adverse orders, or even financial penalties. For owners and residents, the directive strengthens protections and provides clearer recourse if governance structures are not followed.
The directive emphasises that CSOS is prepared to utilise enforcement tools – including compliance directives, penalties, and cost orders – to ensure schemes fulfil their governance obligations. This represents a stronger interventionist role for CSOS, with significant implications for trustees and managing agents who fail to comply.
Final Thoughts
The CSOS’s new directive reflects a broader policy push toward professionalising community scheme governance. While the changes may require adjustment, they should ultimately lead to more transparent, accountable, and legally compliant schemes.
Community schemes should take this opportunity to review their governance practices, update rules and policies, and seek legal guidance where necessary to ensure compliance.
___________________
Johlene Wasserman
VDM Attorneys