Behind every legal brief, compliance audit, fraud detection system and corporate transaction lies a universal tension: the need to act quickly, but with certainty. To innovate, while maintaining a level...
Why South Africa’s public institutions need far more than simply good rules.. South Africa isn’t in desperate need of more regulation. From PFMA and MFMA to POPIA and King IV, governance frameworks in...
LexisNexis South Africa has launched a bold new brand campaign speaking directly to senior decision-makers who need trustworthy solutions in an era of accelerating complexity. The 'Trusted Intelligence...
Beyond the billable hour: How AI is accelerating the shift to outcome-based pricing In his book, Managing The Professional Service Firm , which was first published in 1993, David Maister suggests: ...
The Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) has issued a new Practice Directive that directly affects the way bodies corporate and homeowners’ associations (HOAs) must operate. The directive introduces...
The Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) has issued a new Practice Directive that directly affects the way bodies corporate and homeowners’ associations (HOAs) must operate. The directive introduces stricter compliance standards and clarifies the rights and obligations of stakeholders in community schemes across South Africa.
Why This Matters
Community schemes – from sectional title complexes to estates – manage the shared property and common interests of thousands of South Africans. Disputes in these schemes are often complex, and the CSOS plays a central role in providing accessible dispute resolution and ensuring compliance with legislation.
In practice, this means CSOS can now intervene earlier and more decisively in governance matters, compelling bodies corporate and HOAs to comply with legislation and scheme rules before disputes escalate.
Key Areas of Focus
The directive addresses:
Practical Implications
For trustees, directors, and managing agents, the directive means greater accountability. Non-compliance could expose schemes to disputes, adverse orders, or even financial penalties. For owners and residents, the directive strengthens protections and provides clearer recourse if governance structures are not followed.
The directive emphasises that CSOS is prepared to utilise enforcement tools – including compliance directives, penalties, and cost orders – to ensure schemes fulfil their governance obligations. This represents a stronger interventionist role for CSOS, with significant implications for trustees and managing agents who fail to comply.
Final Thoughts
The CSOS’s new directive reflects a broader policy push toward professionalising community scheme governance. While the changes may require adjustment, they should ultimately lead to more transparent, accountable, and legally compliant schemes.
Community schemes should take this opportunity to review their governance practices, update rules and policies, and seek legal guidance where necessary to ensure compliance.
___________________
Johlene Wasserman
VDM Attorneys