Authored by Luana Payne, Lawyer Senior Associate and Alannah Hogan, Lawyer, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. This guidance note provides guidance on the enforceability...
Authored by Luana Payne, Lawyer, Senior Associate, and Alannah Hogan, Lawyer, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. This Guidance Note summarises key legal issues regard...
Authored by Dr Stephen Pallavicini, Lead Property Lawyer, Marie Boustani, Property Lawyer, Woolworths Group Ltd and Sara Hatcher, Consulting Principal, Keypoint Law (NSW); Lisa Gaddie, Partner, Lander...
Authored by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team.
This guidance note provides guidance on drafting post-employment restraint clauses.
A carefully-drafted post-employment restraint can help an employer prevent former employees from engaging in activities which could undermine the employer’s legitimate business interests following the termination of their employment. The key to a valid post-employment restraint is to ensure that the restraint goes no further than is reasonably necessary to protect those interests. A restraint which unreasonably impairs competition or restricts a person’s ability to apply their skills to earn a livelihood is likely to be struck down. The following areas should be carefully considered when trying to draft strategic and enforceable post-employment restraint clauses.
It should also be read alongside Guidance Notes: Introduction to post-employment restraints, Enforceability of post-employment restraints and What is a repudiatory breach of the employment contract?
When seeking to enforce a restraint, an employer must convince the court that it has a legitimate business interest to protect. The courts have ruled the following business interests are capable of supporting a restraint:
See Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby and Lindner v Murdock's Garage.
To view the full version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.