Authored by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. This guidance note provides guidance on drafting post-employment restraint clauses. A carefully-drafted post-employment restraint can help an employer...
Authored by Luana Payne, Lawyer, Senior Associate, and Alannah Hogan, Lawyer, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. This Guidance Note summarises key legal issues regard...
Authored by Dr Stephen Pallavicini, Lead Property Lawyer, Marie Boustani, Property Lawyer, Woolworths Group Ltd and Sara Hatcher, Consulting Principal, Keypoint Law (NSW); Lisa Gaddie, Partner, Lander...
Authored by Luana Payne, Lawyer Senior Associate and Alannah Hogan, Lawyer, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team.
This guidance note provides guidance on the enforceability of post-employment restraints.
It should also be read alongside these Guidance Notes: Introduction to post-employment restraints, Drafting post-employment restraint clauses and What is a repudiatory breach of the employment contract?
Post-employment restraints are express contractual provisions which seek to restrict an employee from competing with the employer following termination of the employment relationship. Recent surveys suggest up to one in five Australian employees are covered by such restraints. Post-employment restraints are usually framed by reference to:
The purpose of post-employment restraints is to protect legitimate business interests of the employer. Interests that are capable of supporting a restraint include the employer’s confidential information, trade secrets, customer relationships, goodwill and staff.
Although restraints remain significant in Australia, other comparable jurisdictions such as Canada have moved to prohibit the use of such restraints utilizing provisions in Federal competition law and provincial employment laws.
To view the full version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.