lexisnexis INFOPRO
  • Subscribe To NewsLetter
  • Training Videos
  • Product Resources
  • Search
Menu
Meet the consultants Trends
Sign In to Lexis+
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 14 years ago
    • Pressroom
    • News

    LexisNexis Launches Series of Mobile Matter Management Offerings for Law Firms

    Time Matters and Firm Manager Mobile Applications Enable Lawyers to Manage Their Practices Wherever They Go and Convert Downtime into Billable Hours April 5, 2011 — New York, NY - LexisNexis, ( www.lexisnexis.com ) a leading global provider of content...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 15 years ago
    • Pressroom
    • News

    American Inns of Court Joins Alliance Partner Program for LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Connected Online Legal Network

    American Inns of Court Becomes Tenth Legal Nonprofit to Join Premier Online Networking Community for Lawyers February 3, 2010 — LexisNexis ( www.lexisnexis.com ), a leading global provider of content-enabled workflow solutions, today announced that...
  • Alyzza Austriaco
    Alyzza Austriaco
    • over 1 year ago
    • Capitol Journal
    • State Net

    TX ‘Death Star’ Law Declared Unconstitutional & Court Ruling with Implications for AI Regulation in CA

    TX Judge Strikes Down ‘Death Star’ Law A county judge in Texas declared the state’s new so-called “Death Star” law preempting local ordinances, including those mandating water breaks for construction workers, “entirely...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    State v. Matthews

    The evidence showed that defendant and his stepson determined to stop the victim from constantly yelling and arguing with them and their family. They drove the victim to a secluded spot then beat her. While she was unconscious, defendant dropped his knee...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Columbia Cas. Co. v. Hiar Holding, L.L.C.

    Columbia Cas. Co. v. Hiar Holding, L.L.C. Supreme Court of Missouri August 13, 2013, Opinion Issued SC93026 Opinion en banc  [*261]  An insurer that refused to defend its insured challenges its liability for damages that were agreed to in a settlement...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Simon Prop. Grp., L.P. v. Regal Entm't Grp.

    Simon Prop. Grp., L.P. v. Regal Entm't Grp. Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle May 16, 2022, Submitted; June 27, 2022, Decided C.A. No. N21C-01-204 MMJ (CCLD) Opinion CORRECTED OPINION JOHNSTON, J. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL CONTEXT This case stems...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Kirst v. Erck

    Kirst v. Erck United States District Court for the District of Maryland July 21, 2022, Decided; July 21, 2022, Filed Civil Action No. TDC-22-0024 Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs William and Christina Kirst filed this shareholder derivative action...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S

    Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S Supreme Court of the United States December 5, 2011, Argued; April 17, 2012, Decided No. 10-844 Opinion  [*403]  Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court. When the Food and Drug Administration (FDA...
  • Robin Verma
    Robin Verma
    • over 3 years ago
    • Capitol Journal
    • State Net

    The Challenges - and High Stakes - of Regulatory Compliance

    STATE NET ® THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES The state regulatory process can be a bewildering landscape for any organization seeking to have an inputon proposed rules that might impact its operations or merely stay in compliance with all applicable...
    • Thought Leadership Regulatory Compliance_FINAL.pdf
    • View
    • Hide
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Tull v. United States

    The Federal Government filed an action against petitioner under the Clean Water Act (Act), 62 Stat. 1155, 33 U.S.C.S. § 1251 et seq., seeking fines and injunctive relief, after petitioner dumped fill material into wetlands. The district court denied...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © LexisNexis
LexisNexis