Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Another Turn at Bat: ACA Opponents Strike Out

July 21, 2021 (3 min read)

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that plaintiffs in California v. Texas did not suffer an “injury” and thus lacked standing necessary to bring a case asserting that the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional, once Congress eliminated the individual mandate penalty. Plaintiffs consisted of two individuals, plus nearly two dozen states led by Texas. The result: The Affordable Care Act, enacted 11 years ago, survives its third Supreme Court review. See California v. Texas, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 3119 (June 17, 2021).

READ MORE

Related Content

  • Affordable Care Act Resource Kit
    Explore this resource kit which provides guidance for employer sponsors of group health plans and their advisors on compliance under the Affordable Care Act. The law’s impact on employer plan sponsors is substantial and multifaceted, affecting the types of plans that may be offered, the benefits and terms of coverage under those plans, a tax penalty for failing to offer group health plan coverage to full-time employees, reporting and disclosure obligations, and many others. 
  • ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Mandate
    Discover how, even shorn of the individual mandate, the shared responsibility rules for so-called applicable large employers (ALEs), with its reporting requirements, continues to apply. While the ACA does not require businesses to provide health benefits to their workers, employers classified as ALEs (generally those with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalents) can face excise tax penalties if they don’t offer health coverage or, if they do, it doesn’t meet minimum value and affordability standards.

 

Practical Guidance Updates

Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.  


Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.

Experience Lexis+