Succession planning is a critical aspect of managing small, closely held businesses, as the unexpected departure of a key leader can significantly disrupt operations and challenge the business's legal...
Entering into a letter of intent for an office lease agreement? Consult our playbook for valuable key provisions, alternative language provisions, and guidance for both landlords and tenants. Download...
In the complex world of M&A transactions, transition services agreements (TSAs) serve as critical bridges between deal closing and operational independence thus creating stability during organizational...
This practice note covers key legal and regulatory issues to evaluate, questions to ask, and documents to review in medical device or diagnostic technology deals, including M&A, investments, financings...
Tying and bundling are functionally similar, but tying carries more antitrust risk, while bundling is generally permissible under the antitrust laws, absent market power. While tying conditions the purchase of one product on a second that the buyer did not want or would have rather purchased elsewhere, bundling offers discounts for purchasing multiple products, with no obligation placed on the buyer to purchase more than one product.
READ NOW: Tying Versus Bundling
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates in Practical Guidance.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.