Harvard University’s tax-exempt status has been questioned by the Trump Administration—with Harvard responding that there is no legal basis for a revocation. The Administration’s action...
Many states are implementing energy benchmarking programs to track and identify energy use in buildings. These programs aim to encourage energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Check out...
When engaging in M&A discussions, parties should prioritize rigorous confidentiality measures to protect sensitive business information. Our new confidentiality agreement playbook offers valuable insights...
This practice note discusses Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) within the United States, including their purpose, history, and regulatory framework. The note is a valuable resource for advising life sciences...
Do you need guidance on tipped employee requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)? Read our newly published checklist, Tipped Employees Checklist (FLSA) , for helpful information. Read now...
Tying and bundling are functionally similar, but tying carries more antitrust risk, while bundling is generally permissible under the antitrust laws, absent market power. While tying conditions the purchase of one product on a second that the buyer did not want or would have rather purchased elsewhere, bundling offers discounts for purchasing multiple products, with no obligation placed on the buyer to purchase more than one product.
READ NOW: Tying Versus Bundling
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates in Practical Guidance.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+