From the first notice of claim to the last gasp of a confirmed plan, mass-tort bankruptcies are where coverage law gets tested—and sometimes torched. Discover how to stay ahead of the fire. Read...
Lenders typically require an opinion from borrower’s counsel in connection with a financing transaction. Review this resource kit for an overview of the process of drafting and delivering legal opinions...
Time is fleeting—by definition. Before you know it, antitrust claims can become stale. And antitrust statutes of limitations (SOLs) may bar them as a matter of law. As a litigator, whether for plaintiff...
As of July 2025, 38 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have legalized sports betting in some form—either online, in-person, or both. This expansion follows the Supreme Court's 2018 decision...
Building decarbonization and energy efficiency initiatives are spreading across the country, driven by both governmental regulatory mandates and private sector goals aimed at monitoring and reducing greenhouse...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Tying and bundling are functionally similar, but tying carries more antitrust risk, while bundling is generally permissible under the antitrust laws, absent market power. While tying conditions the purchase of one product on a second that the buyer did not want or would have rather purchased elsewhere, bundling offers discounts for purchasing multiple products, with no obligation placed on the buyer to purchase more than one product.
READ NOW: Tying Versus Bundling
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates in Practical Guidance.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+