Section 112020 of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), House version, would expand the reach of the IRC § 4960 excise tax on compensation in excess of $1 million (equal to 21%, the...
Read this practice note discussing factoring transactions, the parties involved, and the reasons for factoring. This practice note specifically discusses the distinguishing features of advance and discount...
Land banking transactions are an alternative financing structure where the land banker (typically an investment group) purchases the land shortly before or soon after the homebuilder acquires it. The parties...
Don’t miss out on what’s trending in the deal market. Find out how dealmakers are navigating valuation uncertainties with increasingly nuanced adjustment provisions, from working capital metrics...
Check out this video discussing best practices for responding to FDA Form 483 inspectional observations. Watch now » Related Content Life Sciences FDA Matters Representation and Warranty Clause...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Among the social infrastructure changes proposed by the Ways & Means Committee for the “Build Back Better Agenda” relating to retirement are reforms imposing an excise tax on employers for failing to maintain or facilitate automatic contribution plans or arrangements that enroll workers in IRAs, SIMPLE retirement accounts, or 401(k) retirement plans. The proposal would start employee elective contributions at 6% (adding Sections 414(aa) and 4980J to the Internal Revenue Code). Budget Reconciliation Legislative Recommendations Relating to Retirement, Section 131001. A contemplated excise tax would apply to deter offenders, equal to $10/day/employee during a noncompliance period. The retirement provisions are part of the social infrastructure additions to the budget reconciliation bill, which may include historic changes to both paid family medical leave, the private retirement savings system, and the refundable saver’s credit. See Ways & Means Committee, Markup of the Build Back Better Act, Subtitle B. While the initiative would cost the Fed, a number of tax increases would help pay for the savings initiative and other Build Back Better Agenda social initiatives.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+