Practical Guidance continues to expand its collection of workflow-focused legal resources with the March 2026 update. This release introduces new templates, trackers, practice notes, and jurisdiction-specific...
How AI legal issues are being addressed with practical guidance The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data...
Legal teams continue to face increased pressure to manage evolving regulatory requirements, shifting case law, and growing client expectations. The February 2026 update to Practical Guidance reflects these...
Summary of Sections Real Market Data in Enhanced M&A Templates at Your Fingertips Addressing the Competitive Landscape Rollout Conclusion M&A practitioners know that drafting...
LexisNexis® Practical Guidance continues to empower legal professionals with fresh, actionable insights and resources. The July 2025 update delivers a wide range of new legal tools, regulatory trackers...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
A Texas District Court recently issued an opinion, in Utah v. Walsh, favoring the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regarding the legitimacy of the DOL’s final regulations addressing “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights.” The regulations came under scrutiny for how they assess fiduciary consideration of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) factors in ERISA plan investing. On a summary judgment motion, the court recognized the complexity of the prior Trump-administration final regulations, noting that “in stakeholders' eyes, [prior regulations] created a ‘chilling effect’ on the appropriate integration of climate change and other ESG factors in investment decisions.” Referencing the Chevron Doctrine’s two-step approach in determining the legitimacy of agency regulations, the court concluded that the DOL regulations prevailed in meeting both step one and step two of a Chevron Doctrine analysis and were not “manifestly contrary to the statute.” The ruling gives ERISA plan fiduciaries room to consider ESG factors when selecting and monitoring investments on behalf of participants.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+