The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), recently passed by the U.S. House, introduces major changes to the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime that could impact multinational corporations...
Class B malls have struggled in recent years with the decrease in mall shoppers and the departure of anchor tenants. Developers and owners are revitalizing Class B malls and filling vacancies by introducing...
Joint ventures bring together two or more parties to collaborate on a specific business opportunity. They may be structured as contractual arrangements, new entity formations, or investments in an existing...
This practice note covers how to respond to a complete response letter issued by the FDA as part of the agency’s new drug application (NDA) or biologics license application (BLA) process. Read...
Want to know how to balance the benefits of artificial intelligence tools against associated risks to employee privacy? Read our practice note, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Employee Privacy , by Damon...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
A Texas District Court recently issued an opinion, in Utah v. Walsh, favoring the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regarding the legitimacy of the DOL’s final regulations addressing “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights.” The regulations came under scrutiny for how they assess fiduciary consideration of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) factors in ERISA plan investing. On a summary judgment motion, the court recognized the complexity of the prior Trump-administration final regulations, noting that “in stakeholders' eyes, [prior regulations] created a ‘chilling effect’ on the appropriate integration of climate change and other ESG factors in investment decisions.” Referencing the Chevron Doctrine’s two-step approach in determining the legitimacy of agency regulations, the court concluded that the DOL regulations prevailed in meeting both step one and step two of a Chevron Doctrine analysis and were not “manifestly contrary to the statute.” The ruling gives ERISA plan fiduciaries room to consider ESG factors when selecting and monitoring investments on behalf of participants.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+