Transactions involving the disposition of partnership property or partnership interests can trigger rules that limit business interest expense deductions. Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code generally...
Interested in knowing what other partners are saying about how commercial lease agreements are evolving? Access exclusive market intelligence about private commercial lease agreements, as only told by...
The seller usually wants assurances that a buyer will be able to fund an acquisition at the closing, particularly if the closing is subject to a lengthy interim period between signing and closing. If a...
A company that receives a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is on FDA's radar screen. In addition to responding appropriately to any actual or potential violations indicated...
We just added Arbitration Q&A content to Practical Guidance’s State Law Comparison Tool! Compare state laws on arbitration both pre-dispute and once a dispute arises across five key arbitration...
Buyers should be hesitant to invest time and financial resources in transaction due diligence without a seller agreeing to a period of exclusivity. Without exclusivity, a buyer risks that a seller will negotiate with other bidders and treat the buyer as a stalking horse. On the flip side, sellers need to be mindful of fiduciary duties in this active and competitive M&A market. Explore these competing interests between private transaction buyers and sellers.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+