In May 2025, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, along with a separate statement by SEC Commissioner Peirce, released FAQs that provide long-awaited clarity on the regulatory treatment of...
Both the House and Senate versions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed by the House on May 22, 2025, and the Senate on July 1, 2025, phase out tax credits for wind, solar, and electric vehicle...
Playbooks help attorneys review, draft, and negotiate contracts efficiently and consistently by comparing favored contract language with fallback language and providing drafting guidance and negotiation...
In the intricate world of M&A transactions, tax considerations often determine deal viability, structure optimization, and ultimate value creation. Navigate the complex landscape where strategic tax...
This practice note covers the development, regulation, and reimbursement of laboratory developed tests (LDTs), which are typically used when an FDA-approved test does not exist, when FDA-approved tests...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Buyers should be hesitant to invest time and financial resources in transaction due diligence without a seller agreeing to a period of exclusivity. Without exclusivity, a buyer risks that a seller will negotiate with other bidders and treat the buyer as a stalking horse. On the flip side, sellers need to be mindful of fiduciary duties in this active and competitive M&A market. Explore these competing interests between private transaction buyers and sellers.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+