Succession planning is a critical aspect of managing small, closely held businesses, as the unexpected departure of a key leader can significantly disrupt operations and challenge the business's legal...
Entering into a letter of intent for an office lease agreement? Consult our playbook for valuable key provisions, alternative language provisions, and guidance for both landlords and tenants. Download...
In the complex world of M&A transactions, transition services agreements (TSAs) serve as critical bridges between deal closing and operational independence thus creating stability during organizational...
This practice note covers key legal and regulatory issues to evaluate, questions to ask, and documents to review in medical device or diagnostic technology deals, including M&A, investments, financings...
Harvard University’s tax-exempt status has been questioned by the Trump Administration—with Harvard responding that there is no legal basis for a revocation. The Administration’s action impacting Harvard flows from its letter on policy changes at the university and a post on President Trump’s Truth Social platform. In Executive Order 14235, issued on March 7, Trump directs the Secretary of Education to propose regulations that exclude certain nonprofit organizations from the federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness program if they have a “substantial illegal purpose,” defined in the Executive Order to include activities such as aiding or abetting violations of federal immigration laws, supporting terrorism, aiding or abetting illegal discrimination, or violating state tort laws. Whether a violation can predicate a loss of tax-exempt status is dubious, but a battle is likely forthcoming.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.