Congress created the Tax Court as an independent judicial authority for taxpayers disputing certain IRS determinations. Generally, a taxpayer may file a petition in the Tax Court in response to these determinations...
Dive into Part 2 of our brand-new 5-part video series about title insurance. In this installment, find out how to order a title report, learn about the steps involved in issuing the report, and get tips...
This practice note outlines considerations for investment managers as they navigate securities ownership thresholds and accompanying reporting requirements. There are several reporting and filing regimes...
If you are looking for a quick training aid to introduce summer associates to the basics of M&A work, Lexis Practical Guidance offers a power point presentation and related script covering stock purchase...
Are you confronting hiring and retention issues with the next generation work force? Push play and listen to the newly released Practical Guidance podcast, “Recruiting and Retaining Employees in...
In Illinois Brick v. Illinois, the Supreme Court held that indirect purchasers (those who purchase from an intermediary) had no standing under the federal antitrust laws. However, various states allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws. Our survey provides a list of states that do not follow the Illinois Brick doctrine in their state antitrust or consumer protection law, by either statute or case law, and therefore allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws.
Read Now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+