How AI Legal Issues Are Being Addressed with Practical Guidance The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data...
Legal teams continue to face increased pressure to manage evolving regulatory requirements, shifting case law, and growing client expectations. The February 2026 update to Practical Guidance reflects these...
Summary of Sections Real Market Data in Enhanced M&A Templates at Your Fingertips Addressing the Competitive Landscape Rollout Conclusion M&A practitioners know that drafting...
LexisNexis® Practical Guidance continues to empower legal professionals with fresh, actionable insights and resources. The July 2025 update delivers a wide range of new legal tools, regulatory trackers...
LexisNexis has once again raised the bar for legal practitioners with a robust suite of new resources and tools in its Practical Guidance platform. The June 2025 updates span multiple practice areas, delivering...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
In Illinois Brick v. Illinois, the Supreme Court held that indirect purchasers (those who purchase from an intermediary) had no standing under the federal antitrust laws. However, various states allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws. Our survey provides a list of states that do not follow the Illinois Brick doctrine in their state antitrust or consumer protection law, by either statute or case law, and therefore allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws.
Read Now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+