Do you need guidance for negotiating and drafting a non-jurisdictional settlement agreement and release of claims for a single-plaintiff employment dispute? Use our newly published playbook, Settlement...
In May 2025, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, along with a separate statement by SEC Commissioner Peirce, released FAQs that provide long-awaited clarity on the regulatory treatment of...
Both the House and Senate versions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed by the House on May 22, 2025, and the Senate on July 1, 2025, phase out tax credits for wind, solar, and electric vehicle...
Playbooks help attorneys review, draft, and negotiate contracts efficiently and consistently by comparing favored contract language with fallback language and providing drafting guidance and negotiation...
In the intricate world of M&A transactions, tax considerations often determine deal viability, structure optimization, and ultimate value creation. Navigate the complex landscape where strategic tax...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Information-sharing concerns between competitors remain present even when those competitors are negotiating or attempting to close a transaction. Until they actually consummate the transaction, parties who compete remain competitors for purposes of the antitrust laws. One tactic used by antitrust counsel to make sure information is shared only for permissible transaction-related purposes is a clean team agreement.
READ NOW: Clean Team Agreement
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+