The United States has tax treaties with nearly 70 countries to prevent double taxation and curb tax evasion. These treaties, based on Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, are reciprocal and...
Real estate activities are highly regulated, and each state has laws governing specific prohibited practices as well as liabilities and penalties for violations. Explore this state law survey covering...
Contractual disputes regarding allegations of fraud are often complex, time-consuming, and expensive to litigate. Parties may amicably negotiate an acquisition agreement without even considering whether...
This practice note covers FDA prior notice requirements for imported food, including scope and exceptions, notification contents and timing, methods of submitting notice, and consequences for failing to...
Do you need guidance on drafting international employment contracts? Read our International Employment Agreements: Key Drafting Tips practice note, by John L. Sander, Michael Watts, and William Ellis,...
Open enrollment brings its special issues. Mid-year issues arise, too. What if you’re confronted with an employee who wants continued coverage for their sick spouse, who enrolled in a high-deductible plan and now wants a lower deductible? Or the parent who wants to enroll their 28-year-old? The answer seems clear: It’s, no—but sometimes we want to relent. Outside of special enrollment exceptions and the over-lapping family status changes in cafeteria plans, employees and their dependents are locked-in to their open enrollment choices, at least until the next plan year. What should you do in administering the plan?
Read Now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+