Working with the Energy and Commerce and the Agriculture Committees, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Ways and Means Committee advanced its portion of the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act”...
As housing shortages increase, real estate developers are undertaking projects to meet the demand in many parts of the country. Explore this practice note discussing special protections and benefits for...
In today’s M&A landscape, earn-out arrangements offer a way to link a portion of the deal’s value to future performance, benefiting both buyers and sellers. However, without clearly defined...
This practice note addresses government guidance on pharmaceutical pricing, pricing in monopolistic markets, pricing in oligopolistic markets, and liability risks. Read now » Related Content...
Do you need to understand state anti-discrimination provisions and protected classes applicable to public and private employment? Review our recently published Employment Discrimination Protected Classes...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Congress enacted the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules in 1986 to limit U.S. persons from deferring U.S. federal income tax by foreign investment. Certain U.S. persons would invest in foreign corporations then convert ordinary income derived from these investments to capital gains upon disposition. The PFIC rules work together with the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules as the main anti-deferral provisions within the tax code. In general, a foreign corporation is considered a PFIC if (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income (having earnings made through investments rather than regular business operations), or (2) at least half of its assets produce passive income. This practice note discusses the key differences between the proposed, final, and new proposed regulations, and how these rules may subject your clients to U.S. federal income tax. If your client has overseas insurance affiliates, take heed; Treasury is now considering the necessity of changes for a test to determine whether offshore insurance businesses fall under the PFIC tax regime.
READ MORE
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates in Practical Guidance.
*Subject to terms and conditions available here.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+