Succession planning is a critical aspect of managing small, closely held businesses, as the unexpected departure of a key leader can significantly disrupt operations and challenge the business's legal...
Entering into a letter of intent for an office lease agreement? Consult our playbook for valuable key provisions, alternative language provisions, and guidance for both landlords and tenants. Download...
In the complex world of M&A transactions, transition services agreements (TSAs) serve as critical bridges between deal closing and operational independence thus creating stability during organizational...
This practice note covers key legal and regulatory issues to evaluate, questions to ask, and documents to review in medical device or diagnostic technology deals, including M&A, investments, financings...
The Bankruptcy Code provides that a bankruptcy court can confirm a plan can only if at least one impaired class of non-insider creditors votes to accept the plan (If any class of creditors under the plan is impaired). In cases involving multiple debtors that are not substantively consolidated, courts are divided over the question of whether an impaired class of each debtor must accept the plan (the per debtor approach) or whether the acceptance of the joint plan by an impaired class of a single debtor, or fewer than all of the debtors, is sufficient (the per plan approach). Be sure to read this article discussing a recent bankruptcy court decision addressing the per debtor / per plan issue.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.