Closely following the IRS’s announcement of 2024 inflation-adjusted limits for retirement plans ( Notice 2023-75 ), the IRS also has announced its 2024 inflation-adjusted limits for health FSAs,...
Use Practical Guidance’s State Law Comparison Tool (SLCT) to compare real estate laws among several states. With SLCT you can customize and generate a report tailored to your needs for comparing...
As Q4 kicks into high gear, make sure you leave room on your favorite associate’s plate for this new professional development video from Practical Guidance! Covering key tips and skills they will...
Interested in the intersection between the metaverse, the workplace, and employment law? Listen to this Practical Guidance podcast featuring attorney Tim Taylor of Holland & Knight. Listen now »...
Review the key issues to consider when negotiating and drafting a software license agreement. This practice note covers, among other things, the scope of the software license, delivery and installation...
The Bankruptcy Code provides that a bankruptcy court can confirm a plan can only if at least one impaired class of non-insider creditors votes to accept the plan (If any class of creditors under the plan is impaired). In cases involving multiple debtors that are not substantively consolidated, courts are divided over the question of whether an impaired class of each debtor must accept the plan (the per debtor approach) or whether the acceptance of the joint plan by an impaired class of a single debtor, or fewer than all of the debtors, is sufficient (the per plan approach). Be sure to read this article discussing a recent bankruptcy court decision addressing the per debtor / per plan issue.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+