Drafting is the legal task that looks most like something a generic AI tool can already do. Type a prompt, get a paragraph. The temptation is to assume that you can now copy and paste that text into a...
Trust built on authority, powered by legal AI The legal profession continues to grapple with the duality of AI technology adoption: 94% of law firm leaders believe AI will increase revenue and improve...
When companies face liability claims, general counsel and corporate legal teams are often asked to ascertain risk, forecast potential outcomes, and justify strategies for resolution before the facts are...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice. The question is no longer if it will impact the profession; it’s whether the next generation of lawyers is ready for it. Our latest...
How AI is transforming the practice of law for attorneys Ask any lawyer what the practice of law involves on a day-to-day basis and you will get an answer that goes far beyond writing briefs or reviewing...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice. The question is no longer if it will impact the profession; it’s whether the next generation of lawyers is ready for it.
Our latest research takes a closer look at how law firms, law schools, and students are navigating this shift. What we found points to a growing disconnect—one that has real implications for hiring, training, and long-term success in practice.
Law firms are moving quickly to integrate AI into daily workflows, setting clear expectations for how associates should use these tools.
Law schools, meanwhile, are balancing innovation with academic rigor working to thoughtfully incorporate AI into the curriculum without compromising foundational skills.
And students? They’re experiencing AI firsthand, often before they’ve been formally trained on how to use it effectively.
Individually, these approaches make sense. Collectively, they reveal something more concerning: A widening gap between education and practice readiness in the AI era.
For law firms, the gap shows up in onboarding, training investments, and early associate performance.
For law schools, it raises important questions about how to ensure graduates are equipped not just with knowledge but with the ability to apply it in a modern legal environment.
And for both, the stakes are rising. AI isn’t replacing core legal skills, but it is redefining how those skills are expected to show up in practice.
Here’s the encouraging part: this isn’t a story of misalignment across the board.
In fact, our research uncovered several areas where law schools and firms are more aligned than you might expect, particularly around:
So the path forward isn’t about starting from scratch. It’s about connecting what already works to what’s changing.
AI is accelerating change across the legal profession, but it’s also creating a moment of opportunity. The schools and firms that come together to define and deliver AI-enabled practice readiness will be the ones that set the standard for the future.
The rest will be playing catch-up.
The full findings, data, and recommendations are explored in our Whitepaper, Bridging the AI Readiness Gap in Legal Education.
If you’re thinking about curriculum design, recruiting strategy, or how to better prepare students for practice, this is where the conversation starts.
To bring these insights to life, we also convened legal educators and practicing attorneys in our Faculty Webinar Series, including:
Access our faculty webinar series here.